> replication (master/slave, multi-master, etc) implemented inside > postgres...I would like to know what has been make in this area.
We do not plan to implement replication inside the backend. Replication needs are so diverse that pluggable replication support makes a lot more sense. To me it even makes more sense than keeping transaction support outside of the database itself and add it via pluggable storage add-on.
Jan
> > Gustavo. > > P.S. Sorry for my bad English. > > 2005/12/5, Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>: >> >> gustavotonini@gmail.com (Gustavo Tonini) writes: >> > What about replication or data distribution inside the backend. This >> > is a valid issue? >> >> I'm not sure what your question is... >> -- >> (reverse (concatenate 'string "gro.gultn" "@" "enworbbc")) >> http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/x.html >> "Love is like a snowmobile flying over the frozen tundra that suddenly >> flips, pinning you underneath. At night, the ice weasels come." >> -- Matt Groening >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate >> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your >> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >> >
-- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
