Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

6 December 2005

• 00:01   Re: About varlena2 ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 00:18   Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini
• 00:35   Re: Replication on the backend Joshua D. Drake
• 00:36   Re: Replication on the backend Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:46   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 02:57   Bug in pg_dump -c with casts Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:24   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 03:39   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian
• 03:59   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Bruce Momjian
• 04:08   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 04:21   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 04:29   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 04:36   Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck
• 04:51   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Michael Fuhr
• 05:02   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Tom Lane
• 06:30   inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:44   Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr
• 06:49   Re: inet to bigint? hubert depesz lubaczewski
• 06:49   Re: inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:05   Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr
• 07:08   Re: inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:09   Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr
• 07:15   Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr
• 07:52   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar
• 07:59   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar
• 10:11   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Dave Page
• 11:03   Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini
• 12:12   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 12:15   Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht
• 13:12   Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Hannu Krosing
• 13:29   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 13:48   Re: Bug in pg_dump -c with casts Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 13:50   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 14:11   Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck
• 14:19   Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht
• 14:38   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 14:39   Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 14:43   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 14:44   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 15:04   Re: Replication on the backend Chris Browne
• 15:23   Re: Replication on the backend Mario Weilguni
• 15:48   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Alvaro Herrera
• 16:03   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Tom Lane
• 16:09   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Bruce Momjian
• 16:20   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Tom Lane
• 16:27   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Rod Taylor
• 17:11   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 John D. Burger
• 17:20   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Tom Lane
• 17:27   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Bruce Momjian
• 17:33   Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Simon Riggs
• 18:27   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 18:28   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Tom Lane
• 18:32   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 18:50   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Jochem van Dieten
• 18:54   Re: Replication on the backend Michael Meskes
• 19:01   Re: Replication on the backend Rick Gigger
• 19:04   Re: Replication on the backend Rick Gigger
• 19:11   Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini
• 19:13   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Tom Lane
• 19:25   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 19:26   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 19:29   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 19:29   Re: Weird Grant/Revoke/Usage behavior Bruce Momjian
• 19:37   Slow email caught in the act Jim C. Nasby
• 19:39   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Tom Lane
• 19:41   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Tom Lane
• 19:45   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 19:47   Re: Ideas for easier debugging of backend problems Bruce Momjian
• 19:47   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Peter Eisentraut
• 19:58   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 20:01   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 20:02   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Tom Lane
• 20:07   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 20:12   Re: Weird Grant/Revoke/Usage behavior Tom Lane
• 20:22   more locale problems on Windows Andrew Dunstan
• 20:33   Re: more locale problems on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 20:33   Re: more locale problems on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 20:37   Re: Replication on the backend Aly S.P Dharshi
• 21:07   Re: more locale problems on Windows Andrew Dunstan
• 22:01   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jim C. Nasby
• 22:22   Re: Slow email caught in the act Marc G. Fournier
• 23:18   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Greg Stark
• 23:24   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Tom Lane
• 23:32   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Greg Stark