Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

7 December 2005

• 00:20   Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck
• 00:38   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 00:50   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Greg Stark
• 01:06   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Tom Lane
• 01:09   Re: Replication on the backend Gregory Maxwell
• 01:39   Re: row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Mark Kirkwood
• 03:43   Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht
• 03:43   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 05:23   Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht
• 05:26   Re: Replication on the backend J. Andrew Rogers
• 05:27   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Harald Fuchs
• 06:04   Re: Replication on the backend J. Andrew Rogers
• 06:46   Re: Replication on the backend Luke Lonergan
• 08:43   Re: Feature Request: Multi-octet raw Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:18   Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 10:33   About my new work at Command Prompt Inc. Devrim GUNDUZ
• 11:37   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Andrew Dunstan
• 13:33   Foreign key trigger timing bug? Bruce Momjian
• 13:46   Foreign key trigger timing bug? Bruce Momjian
• 14:01   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Jochem van Dieten
• 14:36   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Greg Stark
• 16:03   Re: [pgsql-www] About my new work at Command Prompt Inc. Lamar Owen
• 16:33   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 16:37   Re: Replication on the backend Andrew Sullivan
• 16:57   Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Darcy Buskermolen
• 17:51   Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Stephan Szabo
• 17:59   Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane
• 18:19   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Jonah H. Harris
• 20:14   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Simon Riggs
• 20:45   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Alvaro Herrera
• 22:05   Re: row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Jan Wieck
• 22:38   HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 23:46   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane
• 23:53   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane