Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

5 December 2005

• 00:27   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark
• 00:57   Re: SERIAL type feature request Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:31   Re: MIN() performance regression 8.0 -> 8.1 Tom Lane
• 02:31   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 02:45   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane
• 03:44   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Gavin Sherry
• 04:21   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian
• 05:41   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown
• 05:45   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 05:54   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark
• 07:28   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs
• 07:43   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs
• 07:46   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs
• 08:37   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Hans-Juergen Schoenig
• 12:54   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 13:03   Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Hannu Krosing
• 13:20   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 13:36   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 13:47   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 14:09   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Alvaro Herrera
• 14:45   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 14:56   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 15:28   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown
• 15:33   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 15:44   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 15:47   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian
• 16:12   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark
• 16:31   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Csaba Nagy
• 16:31   Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 16:38   Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Bruce Momjian
• 16:54   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 17:10   Re: SERIAL type feature request Jan Wieck
• 17:19   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 17:20   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 17:31   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Tom Lane
• 18:02   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 18:07   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Gregory Maxwell
• 18:15   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Dave Page
• 18:28   Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 18:33   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 18:38   Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini
• 19:32   Re: Shared locking in slru.c Tom Lane
• 19:37   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 19:44   *printf and zero size Bruce Momjian
• 20:06   Re: *printf and zero size Tom Lane
• 20:35   Re: *printf and zero size Bruce Momjian
• 20:40   Re: *printf and zero size Tom Lane
• 20:44   About varlena2 Qingqing Zhou
• 21:03   Re: *printf and zero size Tom Lane
• 21:07   Re: *printf and zero size Kurt Roeckx
• 21:10   Re: About varlena2 Tom Lane
• 21:30   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 21:42   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 21:43   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 23:17   Re: Replication on the backend Chris Browne