Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres@cybertec.at> writes:
> I think I know what Greg is trying to say: I think in this plan stability
> does not mean that the plan has to be completely fixed - usually it is all
> about indexing.
"Usually" problems occur because someone hasn't run analyze at all. That's not
what I'm talking about. I'm talking about a large mature system where the DBA
has everything tuned and adjusted properly and just wants to get a good
night's sleep, confident that the nightly analyze isn't going to suddenly
change the performance of existing queries.
> Adding hints to some comments or to the statement itself is not a good
> solution as well. This is why I proposed a table or some flag telling the
> planner what to favour (= always use a certain index). So the basic idea is
> not to turn index of in general but to have the chance to do it on a per index
> basis. I guess this would not be to complex to implement and it solves 90% of
> all problems without having to hide some information inside comments (which is
> no good at all).
I disagree that this is a reasonable solution.
I want to be sure my existing queries keep using the plans they've been using
until I allow them to change.
I don't want to sit down and type "select count(*) from users" and have it not
work correctly (ie, use a sequential scan) because the system is so single
mindedly tuned for the OLTP application.
--
greg
