Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 January 2006

• 00:02   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and August Zajonc
• 00:21   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Doug McNaught
• 05:53   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Qingqing Zhou
• 06:36   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Greg Stark
• 06:49   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Andrew - Supernews
• 06:52   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Qingqing Zhou
• 07:06   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Andrew - Supernews
• 10:02   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:12   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:49   psql & readline & win32 Magnus Hagander
• 16:48   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Tom Lane
• 16:56   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Tom Lane
• 17:30   Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Tom Lane
• 17:50   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Marc G. Fournier
• 17:59   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Qingqing Zhou
• 18:02   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:04   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Andreas Pflug
• 19:04   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Tom Lane
• 19:14   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? John DeSoi
• 20:14   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:45   Add a "Known Issues" section Qingqing Zhou
• 20:50   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Tom Lane
• 20:52   Re: Add a "Known Issues" section Tom Lane
• 21:30   Re: Add a "Known Issues" section Qingqing Zhou
• 22:37   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Andrew Dunstan
• 22:51   Re: Add a "Known Issues" section Robert Treat
• 22:51   Re: psql & readline & win32 Andrew Dunstan
• 23:58   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Doug Royer
• 23:59   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Andrew Dunstan

2 January 2006

• 00:05   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Tom Lane
• 00:10   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Doug McNaught
• 00:14   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Bruce Momjian
• 00:37   Re: Add a "Known Issues" section Tom Lane
• 00:46   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Doug Royer
• 00:59   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Doug Royer
• 01:02   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Doug McNaught
• 01:04   Ignore, just a test ... Marc G. Fournier
• 01:09   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Doug McNaught
• 01:49   Re: psql & readline & win32 Robert Treat
• 02:30   Re: psql & readline & win32 Tom Lane
• 02:32   SIGALRM in autovacuum.c Bruce Momjian
• 02:34   Re: SIGALRM in autovacuum.c Bruce Momjian
• 02:35   Re: SIGALRM in autovacuum.c Tom Lane
• 02:36   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? elein
• 03:37   Re: psql & readline & win32 Qingqing Zhou
• 07:08   Re: psql & readline & win32 Magnus Hagander
• 07:18   Re: psql & readline & win32 Andrew Dunstan
• 07:29   Re: psql & readline & win32 Dave Page
• 07:33   Re: psql & readline & win32 Dave Page
• 07:34   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? 
• 07:36   Re: psql & readline & win32 Dave Page
• 07:53   Re: psql & readline & win32 Magnus Hagander
• 08:00   Re: psql & readline & win32 Magnus Hagander
• 08:08   Re: psql & readline & win32 Magnus Hagander
• 08:33   Re: psql & readline & win32 Andreas Seltenreich
• 14:55   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Doug Royer
• 15:49   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Andrew Dunstan
• 16:54   What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? Tom Lane
• 17:09   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Jon Jensen
• 17:11   Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? Andrew Dunstan
• 17:23   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Mike Rylander
• 17:26   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Tom Lane
• 17:33   Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 17:34   Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? Tom Lane
• 17:46   Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? Tom Lane
• 17:55   Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 17:55   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Jon Jensen
• 17:58   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:00   Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? Joshua D. Drake
• 18:06   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Tom Lane
• 18:12   Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? Tom Lane
• 18:14   Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? Jim Buttafuoco
• 18:22   Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 18:23   Re: psql & readline & win32 Greg Stark
• 18:49   Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 19:00   Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? Tom Lane
• 19:20   Re: Stats collector performance improvement Tom Lane
• 20:02   Re: Stats collector performance improvement Qingqing Zhou
• 20:48   Re: Stats collector performance improvement Hannu Krosing
• 20:48   Re: Stats collector performance improvement Tom Lane
• 21:09   Re: psql & readline & win32 Andrew Dunstan
• 21:20   Re: psql & readline & win32 D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 21:22   Re: psql & readline & win32 Tom Lane
• 21:52   Re: psql & readline & win32 Qingqing Zhou
• 22:03   Re: psql & readline & win32 Andrew Dunstan
• 22:33   Re: psql & readline & win32 Robert Treat
• 22:35   Re: psql & readline & win32 Tom Lane
• 22:37   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Doug McNaught
• 22:52   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Greg Stark
• 22:52   Re: psql & readline & win32 Andrew Dunstan

3 January 2006

• 03:07   Re: Stats collector performance improvement Jan Wieck
• 04:11   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Doug Royer
• 08:31   Re: psql & readline & win32 Magnus Hagander
• 08:40   Re: Stats collector performance improvement Simon Riggs
• 12:08   Re: WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE? Simon Riggs
• 14:45   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Jim C. Nasby
• 14:58   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Jim C. Nasby
• 15:07   Re: Permissions vs SERIAL columns Jim C. Nasby
• 15:18   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Jim C. Nasby
• 15:20   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Stephen Frost
• 15:27   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane
• 15:28   Re: Add a "Known Issues" section Jim C. Nasby
• 15:29   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane
• 15:35   Re: Stats collector performance improvement Jim C. Nasby
• 15:38   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Jim C. Nasby
• 15:43   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Jim C. Nasby
• 15:48   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane
• 15:53   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Stephen Frost
• 15:54   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 15:54   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Stephen Frost
• 16:08   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 16:35   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Andrew Dunstan
• 16:37   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane
• 16:43   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Tom Lane
• 17:17   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 17:21   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Tino Wildenhain
• 17:22   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Tom Lane
• 17:23   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Larry Rosenman
• 17:30   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Stephen Frost
• 18:15   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Alfranio Correia Junior
• 18:36   cvs tip - stats buffer process consuming 100% cpu Joe Conway
• 18:53   Re: cvs tip - stats buffer process consuming 100% cpu Bruce Momjian
• 19:00   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Jon Jensen
• 19:51   Re: cvs tip - stats buffer process consuming 100% cpu Tom Lane
• 20:17   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Jim C. Nasby
• 20:21   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 20:27   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Jim C. Nasby
• 21:12   Windows Installer Bug ig@freemail.gr
• 21:25   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Bruno Wolff III
• 21:33   Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? Larry Rosenman
• 21:38   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 21:53   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 22:10   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 22:23   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 22:28   Re: Stats collector performance improvement Greg Stark
• 22:58   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 23:11   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs

4 January 2006

• 00:10   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Josh Berkus
• 00:14   Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Josh Berkus
• 00:45   Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX? David Fetter
• 01:15   Re: Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX? Andrew Dunstan
• 01:18   Re: Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 01:27   Re: Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX? Michael Glaesemann
• 02:41   Re: Incremental Backup Script Zach Bagnall
• 03:17   Re: Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX? Tom Lane
• 03:24   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 03:34   Re: Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX? David Fetter
• 06:20   Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup Rick Gigger
• 06:39   Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup Rick Gigger
• 06:49   Re: Incremental Backup Script Rick Gigger
• 08:29   Re: Incremental Backup Script Gregor Zeitlinger
• 13:40   Re: psql & readline & win32 John DeSoi
• 13:55   Re: psql & readline & win32 Tino Wildenhain
• 14:34   postmaster/postgres options assimilation plan Peter Eisentraut
• 15:40   Re: postmaster/postgres options assimilation plan Tom Lane
• 18:10   Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs
• 18:36   Re: Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Josh Berkus
• 18:49   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Tom Lane
• 19:07   Re: psql & readline & win32 Magnus Hagander
• 19:34   Re: psql & readline & win32 Andrew Dunstan
• 20:23   Vacuum Blocking A Deleteion - Why? Brad Nicholson
• 21:17   Re: Vacuum Blocking A Deleteion - Why? Tom Lane
• 22:20   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus
• 22:23   back-patching locale environment fix Tom Lane
• 22:57   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby
• 23:01   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus
• 23:05   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs
• 23:22   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 23:24   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs
• 23:57   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs

5 January 2006

• 00:08   Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Tom Lane
• 00:10   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Trent Shipley
• 00:37   Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Tom Lane
• 00:52   QNX mention in tuplesort.c Bruce Momjian
• 01:04   Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Robert Treat
• 01:10   Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Tom Lane
• 01:13   Re: QNX mention in tuplesort.c Tom Lane
• 01:26   Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Kris Jurka
• 01:51   Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Andrew Dunstan
• 02:04   Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Bruce Momjian
• 02:21   Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Tom Lane
• 03:28   Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Tom Lane
• 04:34   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 04:51   Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake
• 05:23   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus
• 05:27   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus
• 05:30   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus
• 07:11   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs
• 09:31   Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Marko Kreen
• 12:59   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Rod Taylor
• 13:03   Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges Stephen Frost
• 13:37   Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges Michael Paesold
• 13:40   Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges Stephen Frost
• 14:02   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 14:12   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 14:17   Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 14:27   nicer error out in initdb? Andrew Dunstan
• 14:40   Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges Rod Taylor
• 14:54   Re: nicer error out in initdb? Tom Lane
• 15:04   Re: postmaster/postgres options assimilation plan Bruce Momjian
• 16:23   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 16:27   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 16:47   Re: Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian
• 18:34   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus
• 18:58   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby
• 20:35   when can we get better partitioning? hubert depesz lubaczewski
• 20:53   Re: when can we get better partitioning? Joshua D. Drake
• 20:56   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 21:16   Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane
• 21:31   Questions on printtup() Qingqing Zhou
• 22:24   Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou
• 23:42   Re: Questions on printtup() Tom Lane

6 January 2006

• 00:17   Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Tom Lane
• 00:37   Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou
• 01:09   Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake
• 01:13   Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane
• 02:50   Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou
• 05:24   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 15:02   could not access status of transaction 0 Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 15:09   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby
• 15:18   Re: could not access status of transaction 0 Tom Lane
• 15:28   Re: could not access status of transaction 0 Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 15:45   Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake
• 15:59   Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane
• 16:11   Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake
• 16:16   Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane
• 17:08   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Tom Lane
• 20:13   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 22:20   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus
• 22:37   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 23:47   Warning on certain configuration file changes Peter Eisentraut

7 January 2006

• 03:38   Re: Warning on certain configuration file changes Tom Lane
• 06:06   Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou
• 06:52   Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Greg Stark
• 07:03   Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou
• 12:02   CIDR/INET improvements Joachim Wieland
• 16:12   Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Greg Stark
• 16:39   Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake
• 16:50   Re: CIDR/INET improvements Tom Lane
• 17:08   Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane
• 17:38   Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake
• 18:03   Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane
• 18:18   Re: CIDR/INET improvements Joachim Wieland
• 18:27   Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake
• 18:57   Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou
• 19:08   Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane
• 21:03   Test tool for sinval reset situations Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 21:35   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane
• 22:05   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 23:57   Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake
• 23:58   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan

8 January 2006

• 02:12   ISO 8601 Intervals Larry Rosenman
• 08:54   -HEAD compile failure on OpenBSD-current Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 11:18   Re: Stats collector performance improvement Hannu Krosing
• 12:33   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 12:52   stat /etc/localtime 38000 times on startup? Andrew Dunstan
• 13:00   Libpq COPY optimization Alon Goldshuv
• 13:05   Re: stat /etc/localtime 38000 times on startup? Magnus Hagander
• 13:37   plperl header fix and rationalisation Andrew Dunstan
• 13:52   Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working on mips[el]? Jim Buttafuoco
• 13:57   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Kenneth Marshall
• 14:52   Re: plperl header fix and rationalisation Andrew Dunstan
• 15:49   Re: Stats collector performance improvement Greg Stark
• 15:59   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 17:25   Re: Libpq COPY optimization Luke Lonergan
• 17:44   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane
• 18:00   Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane
• 18:41   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 18:47   Re: stat /etc/localtime 38000 times on startup? Tom Lane
• 18:51   Re: Libpq COPY optimization Tom Lane
• 20:34   Re: -HEAD compile failure on OpenBSD-current Tom Lane
• 21:14   cleaning up plperl warnings Andrew Dunstan

9 January 2006

• 00:04   lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane
• 02:29   TODO: Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address kevin brintnall
• 02:35   Re: TODO: Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address Tom Lane
• 04:39   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Greg Stark
• 06:55   Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 09:28   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs
• 09:52   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Lukas Smith
• 10:01   Re: Incremental Backup Script Gregor Zeitlinger
• 10:45   Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Michael Glaesemann
• 11:17   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 12:35   Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Larry Rosenman
• 12:40   Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Jim Buttafuoco
• 13:03   Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 13:21   Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Jim Buttafuoco
• 13:38   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 14:06   Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Ron Mayer
• 14:16   Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Ron Mayer
• 14:48   Re: Stats collector performance improvement Hannu Krosing
• 15:03   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane
• 15:21   Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Kurt Roeckx
• 15:21   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 15:25   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 15:47   Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Jim Buttafuoco
• 16:06   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane
• 16:17   Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway
• 16:57   Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane
• 17:05   Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake
• 17:20   Re: [PATCHES] plpgsql: check domain constraints Tom Lane
• 17:28   Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane
• 18:23   Re: PLs and domain constraints Thomas Hallgren
• 18:28   Re: PLs and domain constraints Tom Lane
• 18:29   Re: PLs and domain constraints Neil Conway
• 18:41   Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake
• 18:42   Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway
• 18:51   Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane
• 19:22   Fw: Returned mail: see transcript for details Jim Buttafuoco
• 19:23   พนักงานธุรการยุคใหม่ Modern Office Management System Waso Training Center
• 19:30   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 20:23   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane
• 21:38   Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway
• 21:49   Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane
• 22:11   Re: cleaning up plperl warnings Bruce Momjian
• 22:19   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 22:39   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Bruce Momjian
• 22:43   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane
• 22:49   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 22:50   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Bruce Momjian
• 23:01   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 23:41   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 23:59   Re: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working on mips[el]? Jim Buttafuoco

10 January 2006

• 00:06   Re: cleaning up plperl warnings Andrew Dunstan
• 00:20   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane
• 02:08   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 10:24   current_setting returns 'unset' Peter Eisentraut
• 14:31   Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway
• 14:32   Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Peter Eisentraut
• 14:33   Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Joe Conway
• 14:37   Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tony Caduto
• 14:51   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Bruce Momjian
• 14:56   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Dave Page
• 15:26   Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Tom Lane
• 15:55   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Harald Fuchs
• 16:15   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tom Lane
• 16:15   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Dave Page
• 16:47   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Harald Fuchs
• 19:34   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs
• 19:51   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Dave Page
• 20:08   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Josh Berkus
• 20:12   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tom Lane
• 21:00   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 21:55   Re: [COMMITTERS] A question about index internals Jaime Casanova
• 22:39   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby
• 22:50   Is Optimizer smart enough? tmorelli@tmorelli.com.br

11 January 2006

• 01:44   cvs update taking a long time Michael Fuhr
• 01:45   Re: cvs update taking a long time Michael Fuhr
• 02:39   Re: cvs update taking a long time Marc G. Fournier
• 02:52   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tony Caduto
• 04:08   Re: Is Optimizer smart enough? Tom Lane
• 06:45   leaks in TopMemoryContext? Neil Conway
• 06:58   Re: leaks in TopMemoryContext? Tom Lane
• 07:06   Re: leaks in TopMemoryContext? Neil Conway
• 09:33   Overflow of bgwriter's request queue ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 13:42   PG process architecture Milen Kulev
• 13:53   Re: leaks in TopMemoryContext? Tom Lane
• 13:58   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 14:37   Re: PG process architecture Tom Lane
• 14:38   Re: PG process architecture Milen Kulev
• 15:02   Re: PG process architecture Joshua D. Drake
• 15:10   FW: Intermittent Stats Failiures: firefly: HEAD Larry Rosenman
• 17:16   Re: Overflow of bgwriter's request queue Tom Lane
• 19:31   Re: FW: Intermittent Stats Failiures: firefly: HEAD Tom Lane
• 20:31   sort operation leads planner to different number of rows? Robert Treat
• 20:39   Re: sort operation leads planner to different number of rows? Tom Lane
• 22:24   Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou

12 January 2006

• 00:03   Re: Checkpoint question Simon Riggs
• 00:46   Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou
• 02:12   Re: Checkpoint question Tom Lane
• 02:33   Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou
• 02:34   Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou
• 07:58   Re: Checkpoint question Simon Riggs
• 08:08   Re: Checkpoint question Simon Riggs
• 08:15   Re: Checkpoint question Tom Lane
• 08:50   Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou
• 14:10   Re: Libpq COPY optimization Alon Goldshuv
• 20:53   Re: Checkpoint question Jim C. Nasby
• 21:00   Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou
• 21:46   Contrib Schemas David Fetter
• 22:12   Re: Libpq COPY optimization Tom Lane
• 22:16   Re: Contrib Schemas Mark Kirkwood
• 22:33   Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Anjan Kumar. A.
• 22:33   Re: Contrib Schemas Andrew Dunstan
• 23:33   Re: Contrib Schemas Tom Lane

13 January 2006

• 00:05   Re: Contrib Schemas Josh Berkus
• 00:58   Re: Contrib Schemas Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:34   Re: Contrib Schemas John DeSoi
• 03:48   Re: Overflow of bgwriter's request queue ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 04:10   Re: [SQL] info is a reserved word? Tom Lane
• 08:37   GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges kevin brintnall
• 09:20   Re: GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:53   C++ -> C : Module for converting the WHERE clause to the canonical form with PostgreSQL St Valentine
• 12:40   PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Magnus Hagander
• 12:51   Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 
• 14:04   Re: GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges Tom Lane
• 14:24   Re: C++ -> C : Module for converting the WHERE clause to the canonical form with PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges kevin brintnall
• 15:13   Control File Bruno Almeida do Lago
• 17:05   Re: Control File Qingqing Zhou
• 17:10   Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Qingqing Zhou
• 17:26   Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Magnus Hagander
• 17:40   Re: Checkpoint question Jim C. Nasby
• 18:18   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs
• 18:26   Re: Contrib Schemas Simon Riggs
• 18:28   Re: Contrib Schemas Josh Berkus
• 20:17   Re: Contrib Schemas John DeSoi
• 20:39   simple utility commands (src/backend/commands) Gevik babakhani
• 21:17   Re: simple utility commands (src/backend/commands) Jonah H. Harris

14 January 2006

• 00:13   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus
• 03:37   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Tom Lane
• 03:53   message for constraint Jaime Casanova
• 08:13   Re: message for constraint Peter Eisentraut
• 09:20   Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
• 09:28   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Michael Glaesemann
• 09:34   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Lukas Smith
• 14:32   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Rod Taylor
• 14:42   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Lukas Smith
• 15:08   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 15:17   Re: message for constraint Jaime Casanova
• 15:40   Re: PG process architecture Denis Lussier
• 17:16   Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 Magnus Hagander
• 17:44   Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 Tom Lane
• 19:20   Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 Magnus Hagander
• 19:33   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:09   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 20:12   Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou

15 January 2006

• 04:08   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Greg Stark
• 15:11   Coding standards? Recommendations? korry
• 15:16   Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan
• 15:38   Re: Coding standards? Recommendations? James William Pye
• 16:32   Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane
• 16:45   Re: pgxs/windows Magnus Hagander
• 17:06   Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan
• 17:10   Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane
• 17:18   Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan
• 17:59   Re: Coding standards? Recommendations? korry
• 20:57   Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan
• 21:02   Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan
• 22:03   ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Tom Lane
• 22:08   Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane
• 22:20   Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan
• 22:35   Problem with the Planner Anjan Kumar. A.
• 23:15   Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane
• 23:20   Re: Problem with the Planner Gavin Sherry
• 23:41   Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan

16 January 2006

• 00:00   Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane
• 04:07   Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Rod Taylor
• 07:06   Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index Simon Riggs
• 07:32   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs
• 07:35   Re: Coding standards? Recommendations? Simon Riggs
• 07:49   source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland
• 10:51   Re: source documentation tool doxygen Thomas Hallgren
• 11:43   Re: source documentation tool doxygen Kim Bisgaard
• 12:38   Re: source documentation tool doxygen Andrew Dunstan
• 12:58   [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. R, Rajesh (STSD)
• 13:42   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Rod Taylor
• 14:16   Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:58   Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Tom Lane
• 16:05   Docs off on ILIKE indexing? Magnus Hagander
• 16:07   Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Tom Lane
• 16:36   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane
• 16:58   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. Tom Lane
• 17:03   Re: Docs off on ILIKE indexing? Tom Lane
• 17:22   Re: source documentation tool doxygen Thomas Hallgren
• 17:25   Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Jim C. Nasby
• 17:26   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby
• 17:31   Re: source documentation tool doxygen Neil Conway
• 17:51   Re: source documentation tool doxygen Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Jim C. Nasby
• 18:03   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs
• 18:19   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs
• 18:20   Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Bruce Momjian
• 18:23   Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Joshua D. Drake
• 18:32   Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Magnus Hagander
• 18:33   Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Bruce Momjian
• 18:43   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane
• 19:05   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs
• 19:25   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Manfred Koizar
• 19:38   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Tom Lane
• 19:52   Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? Tom Lane
• 19:59   Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? David Fetter
• 20:02   Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? Tom Lane
• 20:02   Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? Jonah H. Harris
• 20:08   Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? David Fetter
• 20:20   equivalence class not working? uwcssa
• 20:21   Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? Tom Lane
• 20:46   Re: equivalence class not working? Tom Lane
• 20:49   Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:51   Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? David Fetter
• 20:51   Re: source documentation tool doxygen Michael Glaesemann
• 21:35   Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Tom Lane
• 22:04   Re: source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland
• 22:32   Re: source documentation tool doxygen Bruce Momjian
• 22:40   Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen Marc G. Fournier
• 23:03   Re: equivalence class not working? uwcssa
• 23:34   Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen Michael Glaesemann
• 23:41   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs
• 23:42   Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen Robert Treat
• 23:54   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs

17 January 2006

• 00:02   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane
• 01:41   Re: source documentation tool doxygen Jonathan Gardner
• 02:35   FW: PGBuildfarm member firefly Branch HEAD Failed at Stage Check Larry Rosenman
• 04:01   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Greg Stark
• 04:15   Re: source documentation tool doxygen Tom Lane
• 04:29   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane
• 06:05   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs
• 06:07   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. R, Rajesh (STSD)
• 09:58   Re: source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland
• 10:21   Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland
• 10:24   Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland
• 11:23   Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen Andrew Dunstan
• 11:53   Bad estimate on LIKE matching Magnus Hagander
• 13:44   Error working with Temporary Sequences in plpgsql in 8.1 (8.0 works fine) Daniel Schuchardt
• 13:44   Re: Docs off on ILIKE indexing? Magnus Hagander
• 13:52   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane
• 14:03   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. Tom Lane
• 14:18   Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen Tom Lane
• 15:22   function caching problem uwcssa
• 17:28   Re: Error working with Temporary Sequences in plpgsql in 8.1 (8.0 works fine) Jaime Casanova
• 18:17   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs
• 18:41   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane
• 20:43   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs
• 22:29   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs
• 23:16   debug_query_string and multiple statements Neil Conway

18 January 2006

• 01:01   test please ignore Andrew Dunstan
• 03:18   Re: debug_query_string and multiple statements Tom Lane
• 03:28   Re: Error working with Temporary Sequences in plpgsql in 8.1 (8.0 works fine) Michael Fuhr
• 07:08   Re: Bad estimate on LIKE matching Simon Riggs
• 07:46   Re: equivalence class not working? Simon Riggs
• 08:51   Re: Bad estimate on LIKE matching Magnus Hagander
• 12:09   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
• 12:21   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
• 12:31   Re: enums Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
• 12:32   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:42   Re: enums Andrew Dunstan
• 12:56   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Michael Glaesemann
• 12:58   Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:15   Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Jonah H. Harris
• 13:53   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Greg Stark
• 14:38   Re: Bad estimate on LIKE matching Tom Lane
• 15:33   Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:12   Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Jonah H. Harris
• 16:45   Re: debug_query_string and multiple statements Bruce Momjian
• 18:12   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Jim C. Nasby
• 18:21   log_min_messages and debug levels Jaime Casanova
• 19:14   No heap lookups on index David Scott
• 19:50   Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane
• 19:53   Re: Bad estimate on LIKE matching Simon Riggs
• 20:02   Re: No heap lookups on index Jonah H. Harris
• 20:10   Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Tom Lane
• 20:18   Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Tom Lane
• 20:32   Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:47   Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:52   Re: No heap lookups on index Simon Riggs
• 21:27   Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Tom Lane
• 21:37   Re: No heap lookups on index Jim C. Nasby
• 21:38   Re: No heap lookups on index Jim C. Nasby
• 21:47   FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Jim Nasby
• 22:23   Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Jim C. Nasby
• 22:25   Re: pgxs/windows Bruce Momjian
• 22:27   Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane
• 22:53   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Josh Berkus
• 23:03   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Dann Corbit
• 23:06   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Dann Corbit
• 23:15   Re: No heap lookups on index Simon Riggs
• 23:17   Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan
• 23:31   Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra
• 23:43   Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane
• 23:54   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Michael Glaesemann

19 January 2006

• 00:14   Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane
• 00:14   Re: No heap lookups on index Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:20   Re: No heap lookups on index Jim C. Nasby
• 00:25   Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane
• 00:27   Re: No heap lookups on index Jim C. Nasby
• 00:32   Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane
• 00:34   Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Dann Corbit
• 00:47   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Michael Glaesemann
• 00:51   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Dann Corbit
• 01:00   TODO-Item: B-tree fillfactor control ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 01:02   Re: No heap lookups on index Rod Taylor
• 02:03   Re: pgxs/windows Bruce Momjian
• 02:13   Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Josh Berkus
• 02:35   suppress output for benchmarking uwcssa
• 03:12   Re: suppress output for benchmarking Jim C. Nasby
• 03:48   Re: pgxs/windows Bruce Momjian
• 04:06   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Tom Lane
• 05:34   8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? Joshua D. Drake
• 05:45   Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Greg Stark
• 05:46   Indexes vs. cache flushes Tom Lane
• 05:46   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Greg Stark
• 05:57   Re: No heap lookups on index Greg Stark
• 06:06   Re: 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? Tom Lane
• 06:09   Re: No heap lookups on index Greg Stark
• 06:18   Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane
• 06:26   Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane
• 06:27   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 06:32   Re: Indexes vs. cache flushes Greg Stark
• 06:46   Re: Indexes vs. cache flushes Tom Lane
• 07:20   Re: Indexes vs. cache flushes Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:23   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra
• 07:50   restrict column-level GRANTs to a single relation? kevin brintnall
• 07:50   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) David Fetter
• 08:05   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:10   Bogus path in postmaster.opts Peter Eisentraut
• 11:48   Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan
• 11:55   Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:26   Re: No heap lookups on index Jonah H. Harris
• 13:33   Re: restrict column-level GRANTs to a single relation? Peter Eisentraut
• 13:37   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Pollard, Mike
• 13:53   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 14:14   Re: restrict column-level GRANTs to a single relation? Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: No heap lookups on index Jim C. Nasby
• 14:40   Re: 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? Joshua D. Drake
• 14:43   Re: 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? Tom Lane
• 15:00   Re: 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? Joshua D. Drake
• 15:04   Re: Surrogate keys Chris Browne
• 15:11   Re: 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? Michael Paesold
• 15:25   Re: No heap lookups on index Greg Stark
• 15:53   Re: Bogus path in postmaster.opts Tom Lane
• 15:55   Re: No heap lookups on index Jonah H. Harris
• 16:42   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Jim C. Nasby
• 17:06   Re: Bogus path in postmaster.opts Peter Eisentraut
• 17:09   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Josh Berkus
• 17:17   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Josh Berkus
• 17:19   Re: No heap lookups on index Josh Berkus
• 17:20   Re: 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? Joshua D. Drake
• 17:29   Re: No heap lookups on index David Scott
• 17:35   Re: No heap lookups on index David Scott
• 18:02   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 18:12   tsearchd (tsearch2 daemon) is available for playing Oleg Bartunov
• 18:22   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Dann Corbit
• 18:25   un-vacuum? uwcssa
• 18:33   Re: un-vacuum? Michael Fuhr
• 18:33   Re: un-vacuum? Jaime Casanova
• 18:35   Re: un-vacuum? Hannu Krosing
• 18:48   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Jim C. Nasby
• 18:59   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Jim C. Nasby
• 19:03   Re: No heap lookups on index Jim C. Nasby
• 19:06   Re: No heap lookups on index Jim C. Nasby
• 19:11   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 19:14   Re: 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? Michael Paesold
• 19:30   Re: Indexes vs. cache flushes Jim C. Nasby
• 19:41   Re: Indexes vs. cache flushes Tom Lane
• 19:46   Re: Bogus path in postmaster.opts Tom Lane
• 19:54   Re: un-vacuum? uwcssa
• 20:26   BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member? Larry Rosenman
• 20:29   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:46   Re: suppress output for benchmarking Hannu Krosing
• 20:48   Re: suppress output for benchmarking Jim C. Nasby
• 20:56   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. Bruce Momjian
• 20:58   Re: un-vacuum? Michael Fuhr
• 21:03   Cache-flush stress testing Tom Lane
• 21:11   Re: Cache-flush stress testing Jim C. Nasby
• 21:12   Re: un-vacuum? Tom Lane
• 21:41   Bug: random() can return 1.0 Andrew - Supernews
• 21:47   Re: No heap lookups on index Simon Riggs
• 21:47   PostgreSQL and shared memory. Thomas Hallgren
• 21:50   Re: Bug: random() can return 1.0 Bruce Momjian
• 21:50   Re: No heap lookups on index Jeremy Drake
• 21:51   Re: PostgreSQL and shared memory. Bruce Momjian
• 21:54   Re: un-vacuum? Jim C. Nasby
• 21:58   Re: No heap lookups on index Jim C. Nasby
• 22:04   questions about varlist and Query John
• 22:06   Re: un-vacuum? Simon Riggs
• 22:20   Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane
• 22:20   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs
• 22:26   Re: Bug: random() can return 1.0 Tom Lane
• 22:26   Re: un-vacuum? Michael Fuhr
• 22:38   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane
• 23:22   Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member? Tom Lane

20 January 2006

• 00:44   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:55   Re: No heap lookups on index Jeremy Drake
• 01:41   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Michael Glaesemann
• 02:55   Questions about varlist and Query John
• 04:37   Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member? Larry Rosenman
• 04:57   Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member? Tom Lane
• 13:01   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Richard Huxton
• 13:37   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:56   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs
• 16:01   Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member? Jim C. Nasby
• 16:44   Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane
• 18:28   panic on 7.3 Rick Gigger
• 20:34   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Mike Rylander
• 21:03   makesign() broken in tsearch2 Tom Lane
• 21:58   Re: panic on 7.3 Tom Lane
• 22:26   TODO: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges kevin brintnall
• 23:09   Re: TODO: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges Tom Lane
• 23:19   Re: panic on 7.3 Rick Gigger
• 23:35   Re: panic on 7.3 Bruce Momjian
• 23:39   Re: panic on 7.3 Rick Gigger

21 January 2006

• 00:00   Re: panic on 7.3 Andrew Dunstan
• 00:02   Re: panic on 7.3 Tom Lane
• 00:25   Re: panic on 7.3 Tom Lane
• 01:20   strange behavior on locks Alfranio Correia Junior
• 01:21   strange locks Alfranio Correia Junior
• 02:11   Re: panic on 7.3 Rick Gigger
• 02:29   Re: panic on 7.3 Rick Gigger
• 02:38   Re: Surrogate keys Christopher Browne
• 02:47   Re: TODO: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges kevin brintnall
• 03:43   Re: TODO: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges Tom Lane
• 03:48   Re: strange behavior on locks Tom Lane
• 03:51   Re: Surrogate keys Mike Rylander
• 04:11   Re: strange behavior on locks Michael Adler
• 04:28   Re: panic on 7.3 Rick Gigger
• 04:36   Re: panic on 7.3 Tom Lane
• 04:42   Re: could not access status of transaction 0 Tom Lane
• 06:06   Re: panic on 7.3 Rick Gigger
• 10:00   Working happily on 8.1 (Was: panic on 7.3) Rick Gigger
• 12:43   Re: makesign() broken in tsearch2 Teodor Sigaev
• 13:27   Commands per transaction Rod Taylor
• 15:37   Re: Commands per transaction Rod Taylor
• 15:39   Re: Commands per transaction Alvaro Herrera
• 16:30   Re: makesign() broken in tsearch2 Tom Lane
• 16:47   Re: Working happily on 8.1 (Was: panic on 7.3) Tom Lane
• 17:13   Re: Commands per transaction Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:16   Re: Working happily on 8.1 (Was: panic on 7.3) Rick Gigger
• 17:28   Re: Commands per transaction Rod Taylor
• 17:42   Re: Working happily on 8.1 (Was: panic on 7.3) Tom Lane
• 17:45   Re: Commands per transaction Tom Lane
• 17:46   Re: Commands per transaction Tom Lane
• 18:32   Re: makesign() broken in tsearch2 Teodor Sigaev
• 20:30   Re: Commands per transaction Tino Wildenhain
• 20:44   Re: Commands per transaction Rod Taylor

22 January 2006

• 00:56   Need help in installing postgresql 8.1.2 on Windows Sarvjot Kaur
• 16:38   Re: strange behavior on locks Alfranio Correia Junior
• 16:43   Re: strange behavior on locks Alfranio Correia Junior
• 17:36   Re: strange behavior on locks Tom Lane

23 January 2006

• 08:18   Re: Need help in installing postgresql 8.1.2 on Windows Gurjeet Singh
• 15:13   Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing Tom Lane
• 15:51   Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing Andrew Dunstan
• 15:58   ROLLBACK triggers? Daisuke Maki
• 16:00   Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing Jim C. Nasby
• 16:05   Re: ROLLBACK triggers? Jonah H. Harris
• 16:06   Re: ROLLBACK triggers? Jim C. Nasby
• 16:51   Re: ROLLBACK triggers? Stef T
• 17:36   Re: ROLLBACK triggers? Jonah H. Harris
• 19:19   Re: ROLLBACK triggers? Greg Stark
• 19:20   Re: Libpq COPY optimization Bruce Momjian
• 21:07   unsubscribe Adnan HOTMAIL

24 January 2006

• 03:29   Re: ROLLBACK triggers? Jeroen T. Vermeulen
• 06:57   Re: Libpq COPY optimization Alon Goldshuv
• 06:59   Offer for PG Developers/Hackers Tony Caduto
• 07:14   Re: Offer for PG Developers/Hackers Tino Wildenhain
• 07:20   Weird pg_dumpall bug? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:40   Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing Marko Kreen
• 08:02   Cache lookup failed error in tsearch2? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:03   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. R, Rajesh (STSD)
• 08:15   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:23   Re: Offer for PG Developers/Hackers Aftab Alam
• 08:26   Re: Cache lookup failed error in tsearch2? Andrew J. Kopciuch
• 08:40   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. R, Rajesh (STSD)
• 08:50   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Bruno Wolff III
• 08:57   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Bruno Wolff III
• 09:17   Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing Gustavo Tonini
• 10:10   Re: Cache lookup failed error in tsearch2? Oleg Bartunov
• 11:48   Re: ROLLBACK triggers? Jonah H. Harris
• 13:44   Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug? Stephen Frost
• 14:04   Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug? Andrew Dunstan
• 14:05   Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug? Tom Lane
• 14:39   Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug? Andrew Dunstan
• 14:42   Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug? Tom Lane
• 14:58   Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug? Peter Eisentraut
• 15:58   TODO item: locale per database patch (new iteration) Alexey Slynko
• 16:00   Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug? Tom Lane
• 17:23   Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Tom Lane
• 20:49   Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing Mark Kirkwood
• 20:54   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Andrew Sullivan
• 21:24   Some platform-specific MemSet research Seneca Cunningham
• 21:49   Re: Some platform-specific MemSet research Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:54   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Andrew - Supernews

25 January 2006

• 00:22   Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:54   Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug? Jim C. Nasby
• 03:22   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Bruce Momjian
• 11:33   Suggestions for post-mortem... Philip Warner
• 13:08   Adding a --quiet option to initdb Devrim GUNDUZ
• 13:26   Re: Suggestions for post-mortem... Alvaro Herrera
• 13:28   Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb Andrew Dunstan
• 14:22   Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb Devrim GUNDUZ
• 14:26   Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb Devrim GUNDUZ
• 14:32   Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb Peter Eisentraut
• 15:18   Re: Suggestions for post-mortem... Tom Lane
• 15:22   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Greg Stark
• 15:28   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Tom Lane
• 15:31   Re: Some platform-specific MemSet research Seneca Cunningham
• 15:43   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Tom Lane
• 15:56   looking for explination of bad estimates Robert Treat
• 16:01   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Larry Rosenman
• 16:01   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Devrim GUNDUZ
• 16:01   Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing Robert Treat
• 16:07   Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb Bruce Momjian
• 16:10   Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb Devrim GUNDUZ
• 16:30   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Bruce Momjian
• 16:34   Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb Bruce Momjian
• 16:41   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Andrew - Supernews
• 17:07   Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb Greg Stark
• 17:08   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Bruce Momjian
• 17:17   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Greg Stark
• 17:23   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Thomas Hallgren
• 17:24   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Andrew - Supernews
• 17:26   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Greg Stark
• 17:31   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Andrew - Supernews
• 17:35   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Stephen Frost
• 17:39   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Andrew - Supernews
• 17:40   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Steve Atkins
• 18:09   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Peter Eisentraut
• 18:09   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Greg Stark
• 18:15   Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb Tom Lane
• 18:22   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Tom Lane
• 18:28   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb James William Pye
• 21:20   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Matthew D. Fuller
• 22:02   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Greg Stark
• 22:07   Re: Backslashes in string literals Kevin Grittner
• 22:43   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Andrew - Supernews

26 January 2006

• 00:41   PostgreSQL Solaris packages now in beta Robert Lor
• 01:08   Re: PostgreSQL Solaris packages now in beta Josh Berkus
• 01:31   Re: PostgreSQL Solaris packages now in beta Bruce Momjian
• 02:56   Re: ROLLBACK triggers? Mark Dilger
• 03:17   Rollback Mountain Michael Fuhr
• 04:25   Re: PostgreSQL Solaris packages now in beta Robert Lor
• 08:04   -X flag in pg_dump Dennis Bjorklund
• 08:17   Re: -X flag in pg_dump Dennis Bjorklund
• 09:36   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Peter Eisentraut
• 12:46   Re: PostgreSQL Solaris packages now in beta Bruce Momjian
• 12:47   ... Ewa Papuga
• 13:02   Re: -X flag in pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 13:25   Re: debug_query_string and multiple statements William ZHANG
• 13:25   Re: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges William ZHANG
• 14:35   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Greg Stark
• 15:03   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Steve Atkins
• 16:07   Re: Rollback Mountain Bricklen Anderson
• 16:39   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo Bruce Momjian
• 16:49   Re: Backslashes in string literals Kevin Grittner
• 17:05   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo Tom Lane
• 17:49   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo Bruce Momjian
• 18:06   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo Tom Lane
• 20:00   Re: -X flag in pg_dump Peter Eisentraut
• 20:06   Re: -X flag in pg_dump Andrew Dunstan
• 20:12   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Peter Eisentraut
• 20:31   Re: -X flag in pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 20:37   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Tom Lane
• 21:04   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Bruce Momjian
• 22:00   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Jim C. Nasby
• 22:35   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Andrew Dunstan
• 22:36   Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess Peter Eisentraut
• 22:40   A note about testing EXEC_BACKEND on recent Linuxen Tom Lane
• 23:09   Re: Suggestions for post-mortem... Philip Warner

27 January 2006

• 00:03   Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and --copy-null David Fetter
• 02:17   Re: Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and --copy-null Tom Lane
• 02:41   Re: Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and --copy-null David Fetter
• 08:56   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Thomas Hallgren
• 09:26   unsubscribe Adnan DURSUN
• 13:12   Re: Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and --copy-null Tom Lane
• 13:26   stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question) Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and Joshua D. Drake
• 14:29   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Thomas Hallgren
• 14:46   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Alvaro Herrera
• 14:50   Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question) Alvaro Herrera
• 14:50   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Tom Lane
• 14:53   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Alvaro Herrera
• 14:56   Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question) Tom Lane
• 15:21   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Tom Lane
• 15:21   Re: Segfault Exiting psql Jason Essington
• 15:24   Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question) Alvaro Herrera
• 15:47   Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question) Tom Lane
• 16:24   Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question) Alvaro Herrera
• 16:46   Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb Joshua D. Drake
• 17:12   Re: Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and Greg Stark
• 17:23   Re: Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and Andrew Dunstan
• 17:43   Re: Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and Tom Lane
• 18:05   Re: Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and Andrew Dunstan
• 18:08   Re: Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and Tom Lane
• 18:12   Re: Segfault Exiting psql Jeff Trout
• 18:18   Re: Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and Andrew Dunstan
• 21:04   Re: Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and Greg Stark

28 January 2006

• 03:49   Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Matthew T. O'Connor
• 14:18   Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question) Tom Lane
• 14:53   Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Matthew T. O'Connor
• 15:13   Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question) Tom Lane

29 January 2006

• 00:10   Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Josh Berkus
• 00:49   Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra
• 02:46   Re: A note about testing EXEC_BACKEND on recent Linuxen Mitchell Skinner
• 02:48   Question about postgresql-8.1.2-1-binaries-no-installer.zip(win32) Tony Caduto
• 11:00   Re: Question about postgresql-8.1.2-1-binaries-no-installer.zip(win32) Magnus Hagander
• 16:57   Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Mark Woodward
• 17:29   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Andrew Dunstan
• 17:40   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Mark Woodward
• 17:43   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx David Fetter
• 18:07   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Tom Lane
• 18:19   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Andrew Dunstan
• 18:24   Re: Question about postgresql-8.1.2-1-binaries-no-installer.zip(win32) Tony Caduto
• 18:30   Re: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges kevin brintnall
• 18:51   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Mark Woodward
• 19:12   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Jonah H. Harris
• 23:28   Re: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges Euler Taveira de Oliveira

30 January 2006

• 00:16   Re: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges Tom Lane
• 01:03   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Mark Woodward
• 01:51   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Mark Kirkwood
• 02:03   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Andrew Dunstan
• 02:19   Re: Question about postgresql-8.1.2-1-binaries-no-installer.zip(win32) Alexey Gousev
• 02:20   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Michael Glaesemann
• 02:30   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Michael Fuhr
• 03:44   Re: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges kevin brintnall
• 04:30   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Robert Treat
• 04:50   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Josh Berkus
• 07:44   Weirdness with =? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:48   Re: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges William ZHANG
• 08:25   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Thomas Hallgren
• 08:30   Re: Weirdness with  Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:10   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:13   Re: Question about postgresql-8.1.2-1-binaries-no-installer.zip(win32) Magnus Hagander
• 12:05   Re: Question about postgresql-8.1.2-1-binaries-no-installer.zip(win32) Andrew Dunstan
• 12:25   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Andrew Dunstan
• 12:27   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Andrew Dunstan
• 12:35   Should _bt_pgaddtup, called by _bt_split, pass down LP_DELETE flag? Toru SHIMOGAKI
• 12:35   Re: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges Raymond
• 13:01   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 13:35   Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Jan Wieck
• 13:40   Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Jan Wieck
• 14:00   Re: Weirdness with =?  Tom Lane
• 14:02   Re: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges Tom Lane
• 14:03   win32 server question Tony Caduto
• 14:39   Re: win32 server question Magnus Hagander
• 15:33   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Robert Treat
• 15:36   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Robert Treat
• 16:20   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Frank Wiles
• 17:42   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Jim C. Nasby
• 17:50   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Jim C. Nasby
• 17:57   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Jim C. Nasby
• 20:14   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Mark Woodward
• 20:15   Policy on schema-qualified names Joachim Wieland
• 20:18   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Marc G. Fournier
• 20:21   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Marc G. Fournier
• 20:27   Re: Proposal: new pg_dump options --copy-delimiter and --copy-null Bruce Momjian
• 20:35   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:36   Re: Policy on schema-qualified names Peter Eisentraut
• 20:38   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Joshua D. Drake
• 21:10   Re: Policy on schema-qualified names Tom Lane
• 23:48   New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Linux/Unix systems Devrim GUNDUZ

31 January 2006

• 00:03   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Doug McNaught
• 00:13   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Devrim GUNDUZ
• 00:27   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer Andrew Dunstan
• 00:31   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Doug McNaught
• 00:32   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Devrim GUNDUZ
• 00:34   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Marc G. Fournier
• 00:36   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Devrim GUNDUZ
• 00:37   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Devrim GUNDUZ
• 00:45   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Devrim GUNDUZ
• 00:59   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Robert Treat
• 01:03   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Marc G. Fournier
• 01:08   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Marc G. Fournier
• 01:15   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Devrim GUNDUZ
• 01:24   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Marc G. Fournier
• 01:24   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Andrew Dunstan
• 01:27   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Jonah H. Harris
• 01:54   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Doug McNaught
• 02:38   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Linux/Unix systems Christopher Browne
• 02:45   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Vivek Khera
• 02:49   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Joshua D. Drake
• 02:52   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Joshua D. Drake
• 02:58   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Marc G. Fournier
• 03:12   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Rick Gigger
• 03:41   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Jeffrey W. Baker
• 03:48   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Tony Caduto
• 03:55   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Joshua D. Drake
• 04:00   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Jeffrey W. Baker
• 04:12   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Josh Berkus
• 05:28   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Steve Atkins
• 06:34   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Tino Wildenhain
• 06:36   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Tino Wildenhain
• 06:46   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Tino Wildenhain
• 06:49   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Tino Wildenhain
• 06:50   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Marc G. Fournier
• 06:55   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Tino Wildenhain
• 06:55   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for J. Andrew Rogers
• 07:10   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Jeffrey W. Baker
• 07:52   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Thomas Hallgren
• 07:57   Re: GRANT/REVOKE: Allow column-level privileges Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 08:15   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Dave Page
• 08:16   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Devrim GUNDUZ
• 08:16   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Devrim GUNDUZ
• 08:16   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Devrim GUNDUZ
• 08:16   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Devrim GUNDUZ
• 08:16   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Devrim GUNDUZ
• 08:16   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Devrim GUNDUZ
• 08:25   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Devrim GUNDUZ
• 08:27   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Dave Page
• 09:53   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Tino Wildenhain
• 09:57   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Dave Page
• 10:09   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Tino Wildenhain
• 10:46   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Andreas Pflug
• 10:51   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Thomas Hallgren
• 11:21   Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION Peter Eisentraut
• 11:22   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Thomas Hallgren
• 13:16   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Christopher Browne
• 13:16   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Christopher Browne
• 13:16   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Christopher Browne
• 13:29   Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION Tom Lane
• 13:41   Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION Csaba Nagy
• 13:47   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Richard Huxton
• 14:10   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Bricklen Anderson
• 14:22   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Mark Woodward
• 14:40   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Mark Woodward
• 14:42   Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx Richard Huxton
• 14:43   Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Thomas Hallgren
• 14:54   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Rick Gigger
• 16:07   Vacuum and Hash Tables Jay Jay
• 17:29   Re: Policy on schema-qualified names Joachim Wieland
• 17:46   Re: Policy on schema-qualified names Tom Lane
• 17:58   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Jim C. Nasby
• 18:02   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Jim C. Nasby
• 18:11   Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION Jim C. Nasby
• 18:43   Re: Policy on schema-qualified names Joachim Wieland
• 19:01   Re: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Jeffrey W. Baker
• 19:04   Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION Michael Paesold
• 19:14   Re: Configuration WAS: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Josh Berkus
• 19:16   Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION Alvaro Herrera
• 19:36   Re: Configuration WAS: New project launched : PostgreSQL Jeffrey W. Baker
• 20:02   Re: Configuration WAS: New project launched : PostgreSQL Josh Berkus
• 20:19   Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION Greg Stark
• 22:06   Re: Configuration WAS: New project launched : PostgreSQL Jim C. Nasby
• 22:11   Re: Configuration WAS: New project launched : PostgreSQL Jeffrey W. Baker
• 22:17   Re: Configuration WAS: New project launched : PostgreSQL Jim C. Nasby
• 23:03   Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION Bruce Momjian