Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Date
Msg-id 43C2EF78.7010207@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>>I'm just about out of ideas and right out of time to spend on this.
>>    
>>
>
>We could just file a Perl bug report and wait for them to fix it.
>
>    
>  
>

done

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: cleaning up plperl warnings
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)