Re: un-vacuum? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Fuhr
Subject Re: un-vacuum?
Date
Msg-id 20060119215831.GA15442@winnie.fuhr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: un-vacuum?  (uwcssa <uwcssa@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: un-vacuum?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:54:33PM -0500, uwcssa wrote:
> I want to do this for  repeating some experiment results, not for
> tuning the db (pretty much like using an old machine to find
> performance difference for an algorithm).  so if i have a way
> of knowing which tables are storing the statistics, i guess i can
> delete all from that table to archieve this.

pg_statistic stores statistics.  I think it's safe to delete rows,
but you might want to wait for one of the developers to comment
before mucking around with the stored values, especially if you're
not familiar with reading the pg_stats view.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/catalog-pg-statistic.html

-- 
Michael Fuhr


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Cache-flush stress testing