Re: panic on 7.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: panic on 7.3
Date
Msg-id 7111.1137806735@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: panic on 7.3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> If this theory is correct, the bug has been there since the clog code
> was first written.  But the conditions for having it happen are narrow
> enough that it's not too surprising we haven't seen it before.

Actually, there seem to be a couple of unresolved bug reports that look
like the same thing ...

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-01/msg00216.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-12/msg00130.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-10/msg00975.php

The spelling of the message has changed since 7.3, but the code behavior
is still fundamentally the same.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: panic on 7.3
Next
From: Alfranio Correia Junior
Date:
Subject: strange behavior on locks