Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Date
Msg-id 43D041D9.6000202@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)  (mark@mark.mielke.cc)
Responses Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Yes. Representation of the DNA is probably best. But - that's a lot of
> data to use as a key in multiple tables. :-)

No then you have problems with identical twins :)

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?
Next
From: Jeremy Drake
Date:
Subject: Re: No heap lookups on index