Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Glaesemann
Subject Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Date
Msg-id DE40DFC6-017E-4E79-9FFE-8D29C5F24C67@myrealbox.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 20, 2006, at 10:50 , Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

>> Yes. Representation of the DNA is probably best. But - that's a  
>> lot of
>> data to use as a key in multiple tables. :-)
>
> No then you have problems with identical twins :)

And, looking forward, clones.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeremy Drake
Date:
Subject: Re: No heap lookups on index
Next
From: "John"
Date:
Subject: Questions about varlist and Query