Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb
Date
Msg-id 200601261136.16497.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb  (James William Pye <james.pye@icrossing.com>)
Responses Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
James William Pye wrote:
> Why should initdb give it [processing
> information] to the user if the user didn't request it in the first
> place?

Because it shows important information that we want the user to see.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Bjorklund
Date:
Subject: Re: -X flag in pg_dump
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Solaris packages now in beta