Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb
Date
Msg-id 87y814tc47.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

> Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 11:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > > > Attached is a patch which adds --quiet and --q option to initdb.
> > >
> > > Why is this a good idea?
> >
> > I was playing with 8.2 RPM init script and thought that instead of
> > directing the output to /dev/null, it would be better to use a command
> > line option for that. Also, we are designing a new installer project and
> > --quiet might help us.
>
> OK, as long as you understand that the patch should not be applied.  "It
> might be valuable" from only one person is not enough.

I always wondered why the Redhat init scripts thought it was a clever idea to
redirect the output to /dev/null. It seems like a pessimal user interface
choice. Every time I have to work with a Redhat machine where Postgres isn't
starting up the first thing I have to do is edit the init script so I can what
the problem is.

--
greg

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew - Supernews
Date:
Subject: Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess