Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Date
Msg-id 200601101551.k0AFpnK17299@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)  (Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tony Caduto wrote:
> Hi,
> I just noticed today that Postgresql accepts a value of 24:00:00, this 
> is for sure not correct as there is no such thing as 24:00:00
> 
> PG Admin III will display this value just fine which is also incorrect,  
> PG Lightning Admin catches it as a invalid time, but shouldn't there be 
> some validation of times and dates at the server level?  
> 
> There are people who are using PG Admin III and they don't even know 
> they have bogus dates and times in their databases.

A leap second will show as 24:00:00.  It is a valid time.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tony Caduto
Date:
Subject: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)