Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

10 January 2006

• 00:06   Re: cleaning up plperl warnings Andrew Dunstan
• 00:20   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane
• 02:08   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 10:24   current_setting returns 'unset' Peter Eisentraut
• 14:31   Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway
• 14:32   Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Peter Eisentraut
• 14:33   Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Joe Conway
• 14:37   Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tony Caduto
• 14:51   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Bruce Momjian
• 14:56   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Dave Page
• 15:26   Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Tom Lane
• 15:55   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Harald Fuchs
• 16:15   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tom Lane
• 16:15   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Dave Page
• 16:47   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Harald Fuchs
• 19:34   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs
• 19:51   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Dave Page
• 20:08   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Josh Berkus
• 20:12   Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tom Lane
• 21:00   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark
• 21:55   Re: [COMMITTERS] A question about index internals Jaime Casanova
• 22:39   Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby
• 22:50   Is Optimizer smart enough? tmorelli@tmorelli.com.br