Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4
Date
Msg-id 200601161920.k0GJKUY15040@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4  (<pmagnoli@systemevolution.it>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
pmagnoli@systemevolution.it wrote:
> NT4 is officially dead, IMHO no need for PostgreSQL to officially support it,
> let's leave place for companies offering commercial postgresql versions to
> work on it if they have enough customer requests.
> BTW Win 2000 is more or less 6 years old now ...

Agreed.  If they are using NT4 they certainly should be happy using
PostgreSQL 8.1.X.  So, we will have an NT4 solution, it just won't be
our most recent major release.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement)
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4