[PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From R, Rajesh (STSD)
Subject [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function.
Date
Msg-id 5CBFB210D9870F40B9E5A0FBD31F3A77032F703F@bgeexc01.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

 
Just thought that the following patch might improve checking for getaddrinfo function (in configure.in)
I was forced to write 'coz getaddrinfo went unnoticed in Tru64 Unix.

(displaying attached patch)

$ diff -r configure.in configure.in.1
920c920,944
<   AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo])
---
>  AC_CACHE_CHECK([for getaddrinfo], ac_cv_func_getaddrinfo,
> [AC_TRY_LINK([#include <netdb.h>],
>                 [struct addrinfo *g,h;g=&h;getaddrinfo("","",g,&g);],
>   AC_TRY_RUN([
> #include <assert.h>
> #include <netdb.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #ifndef AF_INET
> # include <sys/socket.h>
> #endif
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> extern "C"
> #endif
> char (*f) ();
> int main(void) {
>
>    f = getaddrinfo;
>
>    return 0;
> }
>   ],ac_cv_func_getaddrinfo=yes, ac_cv_func_getaddrinfo=no),
> ac_cv_func_getaddrinfo=no)])
> if test "$ac_cv_func_getaddrinfo" = yes; then
>   AC_DEFINE(HAVE_GETADDRINFO,1,[Define if you have the getaddrinfo function])
> fi

Rajesh R
--
This space intentionally left non-blank.
<<configure-in.patch>>

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: source documentation tool doxygen
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement)