Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)
Date
Msg-id 3153.1138380452@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> My question was at a higher level, actually: *what* should we be
>> counting?

> Oh, I see.  Do you think small incremental improvements to the stat
> system will buy us much?  I think we should be thinking big here, i.e.
> rewrite most stuff instead.

Uh, I wasn't aware of any proposals for a major rewrite.  What did you
have in mind?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)