Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)
Date
Msg-id 20060127172716.GC18716@surnet.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> My question was at a higher level, actually: *what* should we be
> >> counting?
> 
> > Oh, I see.  Do you think small incremental improvements to the stat
> > system will buy us much?  I think we should be thinking big here, i.e.
> > rewrite most stuff instead.
> 
> Uh, I wasn't aware of any proposals for a major rewrite.  What did you
> have in mind?

Nothing yet really.  But we mentioned it in the recent past.  (About not
using UDP, and also about the property of not having each backend load
the whole stat file every time.)

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org
"This is a foot just waiting to be shot"                (Andrew Dunstan)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb