Re: Commands per transaction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: Commands per transaction
Date
Msg-id 1137868090.53224.36.camel@home
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commands per transaction  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: Commands per transaction  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Commands per transaction  (Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 12:48 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Rod Taylor wrote:
> > Is there any way of bumping this limit or am I stuck breaking up the
> > transaction?
> 
> Wow, I never heard of anyone reaching the limit :-(  Sorry, you are
> stuck (short of changing CommandId to 64 bits, which would bloat your
> tables considerably ...)

Does a subtransaction receive an independent command counter?  If so, I
could shove a bunch of work into large subtransactions allowing me to
avoid bumping the main transactions command counter.

Heck, PostgreSQL could automatically create a subtransaction (savepoint)
with no rollback name. The client sending a commit or rollback always
operates on the parent transaction and the child follows (committing or
rolling back when required).

-- 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rick Gigger
Date:
Subject: Re: Working happily on 8.1 (Was: panic on 7.3)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Working happily on 8.1 (Was: panic on 7.3)