Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?
Date
Msg-id 18005.1137445327@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:52:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Does anyone see a reason to keep this layer of struct definitions?

> If you cut it out, what will the "heap" and "index" access methods
> needed for SQL/MED use?

What's that have to do with this?
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?