Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Date
Msg-id 22967.1136850217@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Is there a TODO here, even if the Perl folks are supposed to fix it?

When and if they fix it, it'd be useful for us to document the gotcha
someplace (not sure where, though).  Maybe we should even go so far as
to refuse to work with older libperls on Windows.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)