Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Date
Msg-id 87r77i0xkd.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > The attached patch against cvs tip does seem to work. Instead of playing 
> > with the environment, we simply allow perl to do its worst and then put 
> > things back the way we wanted them.

How does that affect to the API calls you can make from Perl back into the
database? What if you change the locale and then issue a query from within
Perl?

-- 
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO: Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address
Next
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working