Tom Lane wrote:
>BTW, I fat-fingered the calculations I was doing last night --- the
>actual shmem consumption in CVS tip seems to be more like 17K per
>max_connection increment, assuming max_locks_per_connection = 64.
>
>
>
ITYM max_locks_per_transaction (which as the docs say is confusingly named).
So if we went to 256, say, as an upper limit on max_connections, that
would account for an extra 2.6Mb of memory use - a pretty modest
increase, really.
cheers
andrew
