Re: Reducing relation locking overhead - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Date
Msg-id 1133652737.2906.791.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reducing relation locking overhead  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 17:16 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> 
> > Understood. At 7.3, REINDEXing is essential, since rows never got
> > deleted and space was not reused. That is not the case now, hence a
> > REINDEX is less often required.
> 
> But it's still required or at least desirable under some circumstances.
> If it could be improved, it would be good.

100% Agreed. I just think having an online CREATE INDEX is a much more
important thing, FWIW.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Charlie Savage
Date:
Subject: Re: Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005
Next
From: Qingqing Zhou
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Network permormance under windows (fwd)