Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases
Date
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E8D2@algol.sollentuna.se
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
> > That would be fairly trivial ... let me add it to the 'todo
> list' ...
> > I take it that it would be safe to relegate the
> /pub/source/OLD stuff
> > there too?
>
> Not so trivial to put behind a web interface or the download
> tracker though. Is it really necessary to have a separate
> archive downloads site? It's not like the old ones get in the
> way, or cost anything other than disk space on the mirrors to
> store (and I've only ever heard mirror admins say how small
> our site is compared to many others!).
>
> Plus of course, weren't we trying to reduce the number of VMs/sites?

Agreed. If we're going to keep it, just sticking it in a /old/ directory
is definitly a lot better.

//Magnus

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: generalizing the planner knobs