>Is it intentional that your test case omits an analyze on t2?
>
No; my mistake.
>(The larger point that joins of inheritance unions aren't well-planned
>is true, but it's always been true...)
It also seems to have a probkem with unions in views.
Is there anything that can be done about this -- workarounds etc? Any
plans to address it? We've got a couple of places where it's beginning
to bite us due to growth of tables.
