Re: psql and COPY BINARY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: psql and COPY BINARY
Date
Msg-id 43A0C6D5.9030206@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql and COPY BINARY  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>Examining why psql won't do sensible stuff with COPY BINARY, I realized 
>>that psql still uses PQgetline, which is marked obsolete since 7.4.
>>Is this intentional or just a "never reviewed because it works"? 
> 
> There wasn't any obvious bang for the buck in rewriting it.

The obvious one (and why I submitted a patch - see previous email) was 
for people who use the psql source code as sample code, which is what I 
was doing at the time for PHP 5.1's PostgreSQL module.

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: psql and COPY BINARY
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl