Re: SERIAL type feature request - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zoltan Boszormenyi
Subject Re: SERIAL type feature request
Date
Msg-id 4392A156.9020708@dunaweb.hu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SERIAL type feature request  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: SERIAL type feature request  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut írta:

>Josh Berkus wrote:
>  
>
>>I believe that our SERIAL/SEQUENCE stuff is already in compliance
>>with the SQL standard for sequences (in SQL03).   Why would we change
>>it?
>>    
>>
>
>Because your belief is wrong, but Zoltan's proposal is not getting is 
>closer.
>
>  
>
OK, what does the standard say on SERIAL for specifying the start value?
And about this:

<last serial value was e.g. 307>
insert into mytable (serial_id, ...) values (500, ...);
delete from mytable where serial_id = 500;

In Informix, this is a way to start the next serial value at 501.

Best regards,
Zoltán



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zoltan Boszormenyi
Date:
Subject: Re: SERIAL type feature request
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too