Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Date
Msg-id 17999.1135789988@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> It should certainly be fixed, but surely at best this would only delay
> seeing the ugly locale effect - as soon as you call a perl function you'll
> be back in the same boat regardless.

Right, I was not suggesting that fixing the validator would avoid the
bug.  It just surprised me that libperl was getting called in the
restore-a-dump scenario.

BTW, I was just about to go change the validator, but if you want to
do it go ahead...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Next
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)