Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Date
Msg-id 45365.68.143.134.146.1135791213.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane said:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> It should certainly be fixed, but surely at best this would only delay
>> seeing the ugly locale effect - as soon as you call a perl function
>> you'll be back in the same boat regardless.
>
> Right, I was not suggesting that fixing the validator would avoid the
> bug.  It just surprised me that libperl was getting called in the
> restore-a-dump scenario.
>
> BTW, I was just about to go change the validator, but if you want to do
> it go ahead...
>


no, please do.

cheers

andrew





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing row comparison semantics