Re: Regression test horology failure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paesold
Subject Re: Regression test horology failure
Date
Msg-id 439F2635.7010700@gmx.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Regression test horology failure  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane schrieb:
> "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold@gmx.at> writes:
> 
>>The tests fail for PST/PDT in 2034.
> 
> 
> This probably indicates that you've got TZ data reflecting the new US
> DST rules.  We have not updated the pre-8.0 regression test results
> to deal with that.

You're right as far as I can tell. 8.1 has the expected output.

The failing tests are different instances of this basic example:

Expected:
Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2000 PST  +  34 years = Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2034 PST

Here (and PostgreSQL >= 8.x):
Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2000 PST  +  34 years = Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2034 PDT

Still, I don't understand why March 15th should be day light saving 
time. But hey, I don't live in the PST8PDT time zone. ;-)

Thanks for your answer.

Best Regards,
Michael Paesold


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Which qsort is used
Next
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: Which qsort is used