Re: Cost-based optimizers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Browne
Subject Re: Cost-based optimizers
Date
Msg-id m3slsxei2e.fsf@mobile.int.cbbrowne.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Cost-based optimizers  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: Cost-based optimizers  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
> http://www.acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=297

I saw it in print; the only thing that seemed interesting about it was
the recommendation that query optimization be biased towards the
notion of "stable plans," query plans that may not be the most
"aggressively fast," but which don't fall apart into hideous
performance if the estimates are a little bit off.
-- 
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "ntlug.org")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/lsf.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #114. "I will never accept a challenge from
the hero." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] missing something obvious about intervals?
Next
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Which qsort is used