Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres
Date
Msg-id 200512230035.jBN0Z5b09136@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres  (Ashok Agrawal <Ashok.Agrawal@Sun.COM>)
Responses Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Wow, that is large.  I think PL/pgSQL is your best approach.  I
recommend you create a schema that users can write into.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ashok Agrawal wrote:
> I don't need ability to sit at a prompt and type stuff.
> 
> To be more clear, I am attaching one sample code. I would like to
> migrate this code using postgres without converting into procedure
> or function.
> 
> Thanks
> Ashok
> 
> Bruce Momjian wrote On 12/22/05 15:35,:
> > Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > 
> >>?hel kenal p?eval, N, 2005-12-22 kell 18:19, kirjutas Bruce Momjian:
> >>
> >>>Ashok Agrawal wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Hi ,
> >>>>
> >>>>Here is the requirements :
> >>>>
> >>>>1. Development & Support team can ONLY have READ Only ACCESS
> >>>>   to PRODUCTION Database. They will NOT have access to create
> >>>>   stored procedure & functions in the PRODUCTION on the fly.
> >>>>
> >>>>2. During application support, need to write script which
> >>>>   uses procedural language (IF ELSE, AND , OR,  Cursor, Loop etc)
> >>>>   to produce results or identify/fix issues. Number of this kind of
> >>>>   Requests goes in hundreds during Quarter end.
> >>>>
> >>>>Currently on Oracle as long as you have sqlplus read only access,
> >>>>you can write PL/SQL block and get the work done.
> >>>>
> >>>>Since postgres doesn't support procedural language except in
> >>>>stored objects like procedure/functions, how do I achieve in
> >>>>postgres without using stored objects. If this is not possible,
> >>>>then does it make sense to add this requirement into TO-DO list.
> >>>
> >>>So you want to write procedural code on the client.  
> >>
> >>I guess he rather wants to have dont-save-but-execute-immediately
> >>pl/pgsql code.
> >>
> >>could this perhaps be solved by having temporary functions, similar to
> >>postgresql's temporary tables ?
> > 
> > 
> > I am thinking they want the ability to sit at a prompt and type stuff.
> > 
> ~

[ application/x-soffice is not supported, skipping... ]

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
Next
From: "Qingqing Zhou"
Date:
Subject: Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and