Tom Lane wrote:
>> While Win32 supports 64-bit files, the MinGW API does not,
>> meaning we have to build an fseeko replacement on top of the
>> Win32 API, and we have to make sure MinGW handles it.
>>
>>
>
>Wouldn't it be better to lobby the MinGW folk to fix their problem?
>Or even help them with it? I can't see the rationale for implementing
>a workaround that helps only us.
>
>
>
>
There is a library available from the gnuwin32 project that advertises
fseeko and fseeko64. So we probably have a choice of requiring this
library or doing it ourselves.
see http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/libgw32c.htm
cheers
andrew