Mailing lists [pgsql-bugs]

1 August 2017

• 03:41   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail David G. Johnston
• 06:42   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail Amit Langote
• 07:10   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail David G. Johnston
• 07:14   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14758: Segfault with logical replication on afunction index Andres Freund
• 07:18   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail Amit Langote
• 09:45   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitionsfail Etsuro Fujita
• 10:21   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14758: Segfault with logical replication on afunction index Noah Misch
• 10:45   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitionsfail Amit Langote
• 13:45   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Daniel Verite
• 21:15   [BUGS] getting error could not open file "pg_xlog"  Fazreil Amreen Abdul Jalil
• 23:14   Re: [BUGS] getting error could not open file "pg_xlog" Michael Paquier

2 August 2017

• 02:28   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14758: Segfault with logical replication on afunction index Peter Eisentraut
• 02:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14758: Segfault with logicalreplication on a function index Peter Eisentraut
• 02:42   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 04:52   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14758: Segfault with logical replication on afunction index Andres Freund
• 07:23   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14758: Segfault with logical replication on afunction index Masahiko Sawada
• 09:23   [BUGS] BUG #14764: #if HASH_DEBUG source in dynahash.c is fault. twodragon72@gmail.com
• 10:59   [BUGS] Bug: CREATE COLLATION fails on Windows when used with POSIX Murtuza Zabuawala
• 12:34   [BUGS] BUG #14765: Recreating databases from copied files. vinod.t.v@outlook.com
• 13:32   [BUGS] BUG #14766: Timed out waiting for server startup rajeshkmr921@gmail.com
• 13:33   [BUGS] BUG #14767: Timed out waiting for server startup rajeshkmr921@gmail.com
• 16:39   [BUGS] BUG #14768: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF NOT EXISTS cancelsautovacuum even if the index already exists. mba.ogolny@gmail.com
• 18:00   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Daniel Verite
• 20:06   [BUGS] pgAdmin 4 issues Edwina Lutsch/WST/ZA
• 20:24   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14765: Recreating databases from copied files. Jov
• 21:36   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14758: Segfault with logical replication on afunction index Peter Eisentraut
• 22:04   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14764: #if HASH_DEBUG source in dynahash.c is fault. Tom Lane
• 22:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14758: Segfault with logicalreplication on a function index Peter Eisentraut

3 August 2017

• 00:22   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14756: Inserting row with PK IDENTITY column fails1st time Peter Eisentraut
• 00:28   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 00:48   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 05:59   [BUGS] BUG #14769: Logical replication error "cache lookup failed for type 0" scott@deltaex.com
• 06:59   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14758: Segfault with logical replication on afunction index Masahiko Sawada
• 07:19   Re: [BUGS] pgAdmin 4 issues Ashesh Vashi
• 13:11   Re: [BUGS] pgAdmin 4 issues Ashesh Vashi
• 14:21   [BUGS] information_schema.columns.character_octet_length unavailable if noaccess to pg_database Fabien Meghazi
• 18:35   [BUGS] "could not open relation with OID XXX" when using recreated index insql function Krystian Szladewski
• 19:53   Re: [BUGS] information_schema.columns.character_octet_length unavailable if no access to pg_database Tom Lane
• 20:11   [BUGS] BUG #14770: postgres_fdw assumes foreign table is in postgres rbiro@interfacefinancial.com
• 21:41   Re: [BUGS] "could not open relation with OID XXX" when using recreated index in sql function Tom Lane
• 21:49   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Daniel Verite
• 21:52   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14770: postgres_fdw assumes foreign table is in postgres Tom Lane
• 22:07   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14770: postgres_fdw assumes foreign table is in postgres Ross Biro

4 August 2017

• 00:42   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 01:19   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 08:55   [BUGS] Unable to completely drop pgagent schema Dean Franken
• 11:53   [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Augustine, Jobin
• 15:41   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14769: Logical replication error "cache lookup failedfor type 0" Petr Jelinek
• 15:55   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Daniel Verite
• 18:38   [BUGS] \copy produces CSV output that cannot be read by \copy Nicolas Barbier
• 19:23   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Igor Neyman

5 August 2017

• 22:39   Re: [BUGS] \copy produces CSV output that cannot be read by \copy Michael Paquier
• 22:52   Re: [BUGS] \copy produces CSV output that cannot be read by \copy Tom Lane

6 August 2017

• 04:06   Re: [BUGS] [BUG] pg9.4.10 Logical decoding did not get the correctoldtuplelen Andres Freund
• 04:55   [BUGS] Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_memvalues Noah Misch
• 04:56   [BUGS] Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_memvalues Noah Misch
• 05:03   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Andres Freund
• 05:28   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 09:26   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 12:26   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Noah Misch
• 21:17   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 21:50   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Noah Misch
• 21:52   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 22:29   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 23:14   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund
• 23:34   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 23:48   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund

7 August 2017

• 02:00   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 02:06   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 02:07   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund
• 02:29   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 02:47   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 03:17   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 03:55   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund
• 04:04   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 04:10   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund
• 04:17   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 13:45   [BUGS] Error of insert Foreign table with postgres_fdw Jaimin Pan
• 18:20   [BUGS] BUG #14771: "Logical decoding" does not cover the impact of "TRUNCATETABLE" command hillel.eilat@attunity.com
• 19:03   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14771: "Logical decoding" does not cover the impactof "TRUNCATE TABLE" command Euler Taveira
• 19:19   Re: [BUGS] Error of insert Foreign table with postgres_fdw Tom Lane
• 19:52   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Daniel Verite
• 20:18   [BUGS] BUG #14772: psql autocommit does not work abo@zetescards.be
• 20:32   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14772: psql autocommit does not work Fabien COELHO
• 20:54   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14769: Logical replication error "cache lookup failedfor type 0" Peter Eisentraut
• 21:17   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 21:55   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 22:04   [BUGS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 22:07   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 22:25   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 23:19   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 23:30   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 23:33   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 23:34   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 23:39   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 23:39   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Daniel Verite
• 23:51   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 23:51   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan

8 August 2017

• 00:05   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 00:42   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 00:45   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 01:29   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 02:19   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14771: "Logical decoding" does not cover the impactof "TRUNCATE TABLE" command Michael Paquier
• 02:21   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 02:34   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14771: "Logical decoding" does not cover the impactof "TRUNCATE TABLE" command Andres Freund
• 04:00   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 04:07   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 04:27   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 04:54   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 07:06   Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Noah Misch
• 07:31   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14769: Logical replication error "cache lookup failedfor type 0" Scott Milliken
• 12:53   Re: [BUGS] Error of insert Foreign table with postgres_fdw Jaimin Pan
• 14:34   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14771: "Logical decoding" does not cover the impactof "TRUNCATE TABLE" command Hillel Eilat
• 19:02   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14772: psql autocommit does not work Fabien COELHO
• 19:23   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14772: psql autocommit does not work alain bourgeois
• 22:32   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14772: psql autocommit does not work Fabien COELHO
• 23:15   [BUGS] BUG #14774: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT jym@outlook.com

9 August 2017

• 00:06   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14774: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT Andres Freund
• 01:41   Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers Rick Otten
• 01:49   [BUGS] Andres Freund
• 01:51   Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers Andres Freund
• 01:55   Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers Michael Paquier
• 01:57   Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers Andres Freund
• 02:15   [BUGS]  Tom Lane
• 02:18   Re: [BUGS] your mail Andres Freund
• 03:12   Re: [BUGS] your mail Tom Lane
• 03:19   Re: [BUGS] your mail Andres Freund
• 03:56   [BUGS] 9.6.3 - Backend Crash - Parallel Worker Prepared Statements Jarred Ward
• 04:12   Re: [BUGS] your mail Tom Lane
• 04:35   Re: [BUGS] 9.6.3 - Backend Crash - Parallel Worker Prepared Statements Tom Lane
• 05:16   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Daniel Verite
• 05:23   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14773: Incorrect documentation for the Relationlogical replication message format Peter Eisentraut
• 05:25   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Peter Eisentraut
• 11:08   [BUGS] BUG #14775: Incorrect documentation for the Commit logicalreplication message format kyle@kyleconroy.com
• 23:35   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Robert Haas
• 23:53   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan

10 August 2017

• 00:07   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 00:09   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 00:46   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 00:56   [BUGS] BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continuedblocks thom@genx.net
• 01:29   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Robert Haas
• 01:31   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 03:26   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 03:29   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 06:20   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund
• 06:45   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 13:02   [BUGS] BUG #14777: Postgres Installation not Successful. mithscool74@gmail.com
• 14:21   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14775: Incorrect documentation for the Commit logicalreplication message format Masahiko Sawada
• 23:28   [BUGS] BUG #14778: locale 'en-US' not recognized glenn.burkhardt@utas.utc.com

11 August 2017

• 00:18   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14777: Postgres Installation not Successful. John R Pierce
• 00:39   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14778: locale 'en-US' not recognized Tom Lane
• 01:56   Re: [External] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14778: locale 'en-US' not recognized Burkhardt, Glenn B UTAS
• 07:51   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Noah Misch
• 07:55   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund
• 07:58   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing linecontinued blocks Michael Meskes
• 07:58   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Augustine, Jobin
• 07:59   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 08:31   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 15:04   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing linecontinued blocks Thomas S. Chin
• 18:41   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Augustine, Jobin
• 19:04   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containingline continued blocks Michael Meskes
• 19:28   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing linecontinued blocks Thomas S. Chin
• 19:38   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14754: ecpg SQL parsing error Michael Meskes
• 21:33   [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)
• 21:59   Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane

12 August 2017

• 02:20   Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 02:26   Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Andres Freund
• 08:34   Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers Amit Kapila
• 09:56   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Noah Misch

14 August 2017

• 01:46   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Noah Misch
• 01:57   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund
• 02:04   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund
• 02:35   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Peter Geoghegan
• 02:47   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 03:17   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 03:22   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund
• 03:35   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 04:36   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Peter Geoghegan
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Augustine, Jobin
• 15:33   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14754: ecpg SQL parsing error Michael Meskes
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Peter Eisentraut
• 20:57   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 21:08   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 21:16   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 21:17   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 22:09   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 22:27   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 22:51   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 23:22   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 23:41   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 23:45   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14775: Incorrect documentation for the Commit logicalreplication message format Peter Eisentraut

15 August 2017

• 00:00   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 00:14   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 00:32   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 00:45   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 01:17   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 01:54   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 02:13   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 02:28   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 03:55   [BUGS] BUG #14779: Can't Backup Database myprofmailbox@gmail.com
• 04:29   Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Andres Freund
• 04:35   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14779: Can't Backup Database Michael Paquier
• 04:35   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 05:11   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 07:30   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14775: Incorrect documentation for the Commit logicalreplication message format Masahiko Sawada
• 08:52   Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Noah Misch
• 09:55   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 10:23   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 10:41   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 10:56   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane
• 11:16   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 17:31   Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila
• 19:20   Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas
• 19:46   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 20:01   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Peter Eisentraut
• 20:04   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 21:07   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund
• 21:10   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund
• 21:16   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containingline continued blocks Michael Meskes
• 21:24   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 21:38   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing linecontinued blocks Thomas S. Chin

16 August 2017

• 07:47   [BUGS] BUG #14780: PostgreSQL 9.6 selects a wrong plan during aggregationagainst timestamp columns sogawa@yandex.ru
• 13:08   [BUGS] Postgre driver(9.06.04.00) connected to Amazon redshift, is returning wrongcount in SQLRowCount Asif Shaikh
• 17:09   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Augustine, Jobin
• 17:32   [BUGS] BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentationfault maksim_karaba@epam.com
• 19:16   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas
• 19:46   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault Tom Lane
• 21:01   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault Maksim Karaba
• 21:10   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault Tom Lane
• 21:45   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11:Segmentation fault Maksim Karaba
• 22:03   [BUGS] Hello I got this error when installing postgresql 9.4 on my antsledebian 8 LXC do you know a work around? Manuel Tijerino
• 22:28   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault Tom Lane
• 22:44   Re: [BUGS] Hello I got this error when installing postgresql 9.4 on my antsle debian 8 LXC do you know a work around? Tom Lane
• 22:47   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11:Segmentation fault Alvaro Herrera
• 22:56   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault Tom Lane

17 August 2017

• 03:46   [BUGS] User who created a trigger is not able to drop it Ali .
• 05:13   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows isbroken Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:41   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Michael Paquier
• 05:57   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane
• 06:00   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Peter Eisentraut
• 06:14   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows isbroken Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:15   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows isbroken Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:32   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Michael Paquier
• 07:50   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows isbroken Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:37   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila
• 10:53   Re: [BUGS] \copy produces CSV output that cannot be read by \copy Michael Paquier
• 11:07   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Thomas Munro
• 15:55   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila
• 20:19   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 20:38   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila
• 21:09   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila
• 21:21   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 23:50   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane

18 August 2017

• 00:06   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 00:14   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas
• 00:52   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 04:20   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 07:13   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 07:22   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 11:18   [BUGS] BUG #14782: VSS backup of postgres database vinod.t.v@outlook.com
• 15:13   [BUGS] BUG #14783: The ODBC administration tool crashes when I configure64-bit pgsqlOdbc somda3florent@gmail.com
• 16:52   [BUGS] seems column(alias_name) is a valid syntax? I cant find anythingalike in docs Vladimir Svedov
• 16:52   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila

19 August 2017

• 01:36   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 08:47   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Eisentraut
• 08:55   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 09:03   [BUGS] BUG #14784: www_fdw extension is vulnerable 302790951@qq.com
• 09:23   Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values Peter Geoghegan
• 12:22   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14784: www_fdw extension is vulnerable Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:08   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14784: www_fdw extension is vulnerable Michael Paquier

20 August 2017

• 01:49   [BUGS] Re: BUG #14780: PostgreSQL 9.6 selects a wrong plan duringaggregation against timestamp columns Greg Stark
• 14:53   [BUGS] centos 7 repository Виктор Пунин
• 23:26   Re: [BUGS] centos 7 repository John Pierce

21 August 2017

• 01:17   [BUGS] BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after adding a column.Bug? yxq@o2.pl
• 10:35   [BUGS] json and jsonb bug report Atsushi Ide
• 11:10   Re: [BUGS] json and jsonb bug report David G. Johnston
• 14:04   [BUGS] BUG #14786: Wrong Precision with money datatype nithinkrishna.p@gmail.com
• 15:08   [BUGS] BUG #14787: Postgresql_for_odoo fadheljmuhammad@gmail.com
• 16:44   [BUGS] BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. fujimoto@ceptord.net
• 20:33   Re: [BUGS] centos 7 repository John Pierce
• 20:36   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14787: Postgresql_for_odoo David G. Johnston
• 20:38   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14786: Wrong Precision with money datatype David G. Johnston

22 August 2017

• 09:02   [BUGS] BUG #14789: In Cascading Replication，the "wal_level" is setted to "archive",the operation becomes abnomal 691525127@qq.com
• 10:58   [BUGS] Fwd: PostgreSQL 9.4.13 is facing issue in shutting down Abhijit Gharami
• 11:35   Re: [BUGS] Fwd: PostgreSQL 9.4.13 is facing issue in shutting down Michael Paquier
• 12:33   [BUGS] 直接执行psql.exe出现的问题 樊异森
• 12:37   Re: [BUGS] Fwd: PostgreSQL 9.4.13 is facing issue in shutting down Abhijit Gharami
• 14:53   [BUGS] TO_TSVECTOR acts differently with national charcters Mart Palmas
• 20:39   [BUGS] Re: [BUGS] 直接执行psql.exe出现的问题 Wei Congrui
• 21:55   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14786: Wrong Precision with money datatype Tom Lane

23 August 2017

• 01:22   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after addinga column. Bug? Peter Eisentraut
• 01:34   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work afteradding a column. Bug? Andres Freund
• 02:54   [BUGS] Odp: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after adding a column. Bug? yxq
• 06:55   Re: [BUGS] Fwd: PostgreSQL 9.4.13 is facing issue in shutting down Michael Paquier
• 14:06   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. Masahiko Sawada
• 19:25   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after addinga column. Bug? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:00   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema accessprivileges. Fujimoto Seiji
• 22:31   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work afteradding a column. Bug? Andres Freund

24 August 2017

• 03:35   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after addinga column. Bug? Peter Eisentraut
• 03:39   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work afteradding a column. Bug? Andres Freund
• 09:29   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. Masahiko Sawada
• 10:35   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14768: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF NOT EXISTScancels autovacuum even if the index already exists. Michael Paquier
• 11:00   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14768: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF NOT EXISTS cancels autovacuum even if the index already exists. Tom Lane
• 13:32   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14768: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF NOT EXISTScancels autovacuum even if the index already exists. Marcin Barczyński
• 14:57   [BUGS] BUG #14790: pg_restore - segfault soleuu@gmail.com
• 16:05   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14790: pg_restore - segfault Fabrízio de Royes Mello
• 20:18   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. Tom Lane
• 20:26   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema accessprivileges. Stephen Frost
• 20:49   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. Masahiko Sawada
• 20:50   [BUGS] Standby corruption after master is restarted Emre Hasegeli
• 21:27   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. Masahiko Sawada

25 August 2017

• 01:01   Re: [BUGS] TO_TSVECTOR acts differently with national charcters Arthur Zakirov
• 01:07   Re: [BUGS] Standby corruption after master is restarted Andres Freund
• 02:19   Re: [BUGS] Standby corruption after master is restarted Emre Hasegeli

27 August 2017

• 00:08   [BUGS] issue with C functions using pg_dump Cédric Prin-Derre
• 01:36   Re: [BUGS] issue with C functions using pg_dump Tom Lane
• 03:25   Re: [BUGS] issue with C functions using pg_dump Cédric Prin-Derre
• 03:37   Re: [BUGS] issue with C functions using pg_dump Tom Lane

28 August 2017

• 00:10   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 02:29   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 18:26   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila
• 18:31   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 18:44   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila
• 19:04   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 20:05   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila
• 20:47   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 21:42   [BUGS] Gin Index Creation Failure Yaser Raja
• 22:00   Re: [BUGS] Gin Index Creation Failure Tom Lane
• 23:43   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas

29 August 2017

• 01:00   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 04:03   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas
• 04:35   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 06:59   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas
• 08:17   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 09:02   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas
• 13:37   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila
• 22:35   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane

30 August 2017

• 16:27   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila
• 17:39   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 17:50   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas
• 21:45   [BUGS] BUG #14791: Error 42P07 but the relation DOESN'T Exists! Error 42P01 jfblazquez.ayesa@gmail.com
• 23:39   [BUGS] BUG #14792: Invalid ssleay32.dll zosrothko@orange.fr
• 23:56   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14791: Error 42P07 but the relation DOESN'T Exists! Error 42P01 Tom Lane

31 August 2017

• 00:16   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 00:55   [BUGS] BUG #14793: PG Admin Silent install fp9@hotmail.com
• 04:15   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14792: Invalid ssleay32.dll Michael Paquier
• 05:46   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14791: Error 42P07 but the relation DOESN'T Exists!Error 42P01 Alvaro Herrera
• 06:41   [BUGS] macro concatenation fools gettext Daniele Varrazzo
• 15:01   Re: [BUGS] macro concatenation fools gettext Michael Paquier
• 17:53   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14792: Invalid ssleay32.dll Sandeep Thakkar
• 18:14   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14792: Invalid ssleay32.dll zosrothko
• 18:28   Re: [BUGS] macro concatenation fools gettext Tom Lane
• 22:57   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14792: Invalid ssleay32.dll Sandeep Thakkar