Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values
Date
Msg-id 13673.1502733657@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-bugs
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
>>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>> I do not think it is CREATE COLLATION's job to provide a comment;
>>>> no other CREATE command does so.

> I must admit that I missed that the description was cataloged as a
> comment. Is it out of the question to add another column to
> pg_collation, that just always has the ICU-provided description? These
> seem like separate concerns to me.

That seems like a reasonable solution to me, if it's not too late
for another catversion bump.  I like it better than the auto-comment
thing Peter E. suggests nearby.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14775: Incorrect documentation for the Commit logicalreplication message format
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values