Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Date
Msg-id 6036.1502810663@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken  ("Augustine, Jobin" <jobin.augustine@openscg.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I don't see any relevant uses of sockets in older branches, did I miss something?

No, I think we don't need to go back further than v10.  Even if it turns
out we do, I'd just as soon let this get a bit of field testing first.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Next
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?