Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values
Date
Msg-id 11062.1502052420@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values
Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values
List pgsql-bugs
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> In short then, ICU 52.1 is just too buggy to contemplate using.

> Distributions generally back-patch fixes to older ICU versions. What
> upstream source did you use, exactly?

I went to http://www.icu-project.org/ and downloaded icu4c-52_1-src.tgz.
All the file dates therein seem to be 2013-10-04.

Debian, for one, is evidently not trying very hard in that direction,
since not only are the bugs still there but the line numbers I saw in
my backtraces agreed with Daniel's, indicating they've not changed
much of anything at all in ucol.cpp.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values