Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzkEdUenrBeuOPS2Ezvc_Vu1CnqF6903o5DfhCZxkxZR5A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
>> I take it that you're in agreement with me on
>> pg_import_system_collations() adding a display name as a comment -- we
>> should prevent that, even for v10?
>
> I'm kind of agnostic on that.  I think we've established that that's
> not what we want for v11 and up, but it's not clear to me that the
> current behavior isn't an acceptable short-term answer.  If there
> are comments in v10, and then in v11 there aren't because the data
> went somewhere else, what will that really break?

Either way, we might want to point out in the docs that you can pretty
easily find the details of every locale on the web:

https://ssl.icu-project.org/icu-bin/locexp?d_=en&_=en_HK


-- 
Peter Geoghegan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90