Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Date
Msg-id 20170811015107.GA3623941@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 07:25:37PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 8/7/17 21:06, Noah Misch wrote:
> >> That would fit.  Until v10 (commit 1e8a850), PQconnectStart() had no in-tree
> >> callers outside of libpq itself.
> > [Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]
> > 
> > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Peter,
> > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> > item.
> 
> I don't think I can usefully contribute to this.  Could someone else
> take it?

If nobody volunteers, you could always resolve this by reverting 1e8a850 and
successors.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Thoughts on unit testing?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken