Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Date
Msg-id c199b44a-84a0-cec9-9829-04152d77c9fb@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/7/17 21:06, Noah Misch wrote:
>> That would fit.  Until v10 (commit 1e8a850), PQconnectStart() had no in-tree
>> callers outside of libpq itself.
> [Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]
> 
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Peter,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item.

I don't think I can usefully contribute to this.  Could someone else
take it?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jonathan Katz
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Draft for 2017-08-10 Release
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDEDfor range partition b