Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

9 August 2017

• 00:11   Re: [HACKERS] More race conditions in logical replication Alvaro Herrera
• 00:22   [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDEDfor range partition b Robert Haas
• 00:50   [HACKERS] dubious error message from partition.c Robert Haas
• 01:50   Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table Robert Haas
• 02:22   [HACKERS] Infrastructure for JIT compiling tuple deforming Andres Freund
• 02:34   Re: [HACKERS] Server crash (FailedAssertion) due to catcache refcount mis-handling Tom Lane
• 03:33   Re: [HACKERS] Timing-sensitive case in src/test/recovery TAP tests Tom Lane
• 03:35   [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added waitevents Alvaro Herrera
• 04:54   Re: [HACKERS] Draft for 2017-08-10 Release Jonathan Katz
• 05:25   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Peter Eisentraut
• 05:33   [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDEDfor range partition b Dean Rasheed
• 06:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE insteadof UNBOUNDED for range partition b David G. Johnston
• 06:30   [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 06:31   Re: [HACKERS] dubious error message from partition.c Amit Langote
• 07:08   [HACKERS] "make check" with non-GNU make Thomas Munro
• 07:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE insteadof UNBOUNDED for range partition b Amit Langote
• 07:33   Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure onPostgres 9.6.1 Peter Geoghegan
• 08:02   Re: [HACKERS] Server crash (FailedAssertion) due to catcache refcount mis-handling Robert Haas
• 08:23   Re: [HACKERS] Small code improvement for btree Masahiko Sawada
• 08:48   Re: [HACKERS] Server crash (FailedAssertion) due to catcache refcount mis-handling Tom Lane
• 08:56   Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range Beena Emerson
• 09:17   Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure on Postgres 9.6.1 Tom Lane
• 09:29   Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure onPostgres 9.6.1 Justin Workman
• 09:34   Re: [HACKERS] dubious error message from partition.c Tom Lane
• 09:44   Re: [HACKERS] "make check" with non-GNU make Tom Lane
• 10:03   Re: [HACKERS] dubious error message from partition.c David G. Johnston
• 10:07   [HACKERS] Error : undefined symbol : LWLockAssign in 9.6.3 송기훈
• 10:10   Re: [HACKERS] "make check" with non-GNU make Thomas Munro
• 10:33   Re: [HACKERS] Error : undefined symbol : LWLockAssign in 9.6.3 Andres Freund
• 10:54   Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans Haribabu Kommi
• 11:10   Re: [HACKERS] Error : undefined symbol : LWLockAssign in 9.6.3 Konstantin Knizhnik
• 11:49   Re: [HACKERS] dubious error message from partition.c Amit Langote
• 12:42   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events Michael Paquier
• 12:45   Re: [HACKERS] Timing-sensitive case in src/test/recovery TAP tests Michael Paquier
• 13:01   Re: [HACKERS] Remove 1MB size limit in tsvector Torsten Zuehlsdorff
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
• 14:24   Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range Beena Emerson
• 15:28   Re: [HACKERS] Page Scan Mode in Hash Index Amit Kapila
• 15:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events Thomas Munro
• 16:54   Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans Kuntal Ghosh
• 17:26   Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans Amit Kapila
• 18:03   Re: [HACKERS] dubious error message from partition.c Robert Haas
• 18:14   [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDEDfor range partition b Robert Haas
• 18:18   Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
• 18:23   Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range Robert Haas
• 18:38   [HACKERS] How can I find a specific collation in pg_collation when using ICU? MauMau
• 18:47   Re: [HACKERS] Cache lookup errors with functions manipulation object addresses Aleksander Alekseev
• 18:59   Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans Haribabu Kommi
• 19:14   [HACKERS] Review of DDL replication solution Jeremy Finzel
• 19:21   Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans Haribabu Kommi
• 19:23   Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions Petr Jelinek
• 19:35   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation Robert Haas
• 19:39   Re: [HACKERS] Timing-sensitive case in src/test/recovery TAP tests Tom Lane
• 19:39   Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables Thomas Munro
• 20:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events Tom Lane
• 20:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events Robert Haas
• 20:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events Tom Lane
• 21:18   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events David Fetter
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] "make check" with non-GNU make Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] Remove 1MB size limit in tsvector Ildus Kurbangaliev
• 21:30   Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6) Shubham Barai
• 21:42   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Failover Slots Robert Haas
• 22:38   Re: [HACKERS] Remove 1MB size limit in tsvector Robert Haas
• 22:44   Re: [HACKERS] How can I find a specific collation in pg_collationwhen using ICU? Peter Eisentraut
• 22:54   [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 9 and week 10) Shubham Barai
• 23:05   Re: [HACKERS] How can I find a specific collation in pg_collationwhen using ICU? Peter Geoghegan
• 23:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events Alvaro Herrera
• 23:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events Tom Lane