Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events
Date
Msg-id 23772.1502288054@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> As for whether hypothetical check scripts would ever be run, I was
> thinking we should stick them under some make target that developers
> run all the time anyway -- perhaps "check".  Shouldn't we catch simple
> mechanically detectable problems as early in the pipeline as possible?

Adding overhead to every developer's every test cycle doesn't sound
like a win.  Possibly a reasonable compromise would be to have some
buildfarm members running this check.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events