Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recentlyadded wait events
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY4oDqzgSYmM1DTC-ry++yHvPots6XGqJorOrvxFQDhKQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> As for whether hypothetical check scripts would ever be run, I was
>> thinking we should stick them under some make target that developers
>> run all the time anyway -- perhaps "check".  Shouldn't we catch simple
>> mechanically detectable problems as early in the pipeline as possible?
>
> Adding overhead to every developer's every test cycle doesn't sound
> like a win.

If it takes 100ms, nobody's gonna notice.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events