Re: [HACKERS] Server crash (FailedAssertion) due to catcache refcount mis-handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Server crash (FailedAssertion) due to catcache refcount mis-handling
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobhEYpK97hQuWs8v9Ypgvc=Pjoawk4C4Ue9QLt0zNKzxw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Server crash (FailedAssertion) due to catcache refcount mis-handling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Server crash (FailedAssertion) due to catcache refcount mis-handling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> In the meantime, I think my vote would be to remove AtEOXact_CatCache.

In all supported branches?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure onPostgres 9.6.1
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Small code improvement for btree