Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> In the meantime, I think my vote would be to remove AtEOXact_CatCache.
> In all supported branches?
Whatever we do about this issue, I don't feel a need to do it further
back than HEAD. It's a non-problem except in an assert-enabled build,
and we don't recommend running those for production, only development.
regards, tom lane
