On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> In the meantime, I think my vote would be to remove AtEOXact_CatCache.
>
>> In all supported branches?
>
> Whatever we do about this issue, I don't feel a need to do it further
> back than HEAD. It's a non-problem except in an assert-enabled build,
> and we don't recommend running those for production, only development.
Sure, but people still do testing and development against older
branches - bug fixes, for example. It doesn't make much sense to me
to leave code that we know does the wrong thing in the back branches.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
