Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure on Postgres 9.6.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure on Postgres 9.6.1
Date
Msg-id 30355.1502248624@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure onPostgres 9.6.1  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure onPostgres 9.6.1  (Justin Workman <justin@photolynx.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
>> A customer is on 9.6.1, and complains of a segfault observed at least
>> 3 times.
> ...
> For the sake of the archives: this now looks very much like the issue
> that Tom just fixed with commit
> 9bf4068cc321a4d44ac54089ab651a49d89bb567.

Yeah, particularly seeing that $customer noted that some of the
columns involved were UUIDs:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOxz3fqK9Y0GntL8MDoeZjy2Ot_6Lx1YvHAY6Bd1vYkUp-iS_A@mail.gmail.com

Good to have gotten to the bottom of that one.  Too bad it just
missed the train for 9.6.4.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Beena Emerson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range
Next
From: Justin Workman
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure onPostgres 9.6.1