Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure onPostgres 9.6.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Workman
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure onPostgres 9.6.1
Date
Msg-id CAOxz3frWEp3FgbccdVtzhvV5GvaLk6C2zJRzQs63Rd4Qkun1EQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure on Postgres 9.6.1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
>> A customer is on 9.6.1, and complains of a segfault observed at least
>> 3 times.
> ...
> For the sake of the archives: this now looks very much like the issue
> that Tom just fixed with commit
> 9bf4068cc321a4d44ac54089ab651a49d89bb567.

Yeah, particularly seeing that $customer noted that some of the
columns involved were UUIDs:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOxz3fqK9Y0GntL8MDoeZjy2Ot_6Lx1YvHAY6Bd1vYkUp-iS_A@mail.gmail.com

Good to have gotten to the bottom of that one.  Too bad it just
missed the train for 9.6.4.

                        regards, tom lane

 $customer, here. I just want to thank everyone involved for getting to the bottom of this and for your support. Even if it missed the 9.6.4 release, I'm very grateful for your help. We haven't had much of an issue since disabling parallel workers so nothing is harmed by waiting a little longer.

Thanks,
Justin

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure on Postgres 9.6.1
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] dubious error message from partition.c